SOS Forum
Today's Active Topics · FORUM INDEX · Search Forum · Who's Online? · FAQs/Help · Calendar

Main Forums >> Recording Techniques
Previous thread Previous   View all threads Topics   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

Steve Hill
member


Reged: 07/01/03
Posts: 13140
Loc: Oxfordshire
Re: 192K vs. 96K recording.
      10/10/06 08:31 AM
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote  
I've never heard a difference and doubt that it justifies the manipulation and storage of the attendant massive audio files. I have seen arguments that say it "must" be better, but I reckon that's usually wish-fulfilment by people who have already bought the gear.

IMO it's all hype by equipment manufacturers looking to get everyone to upgrade.

I've gone to 96k on a couple of projects such as solo/duet classical pieces with a lot of dynamic range. Other than that, I'm as inexperienced as the previous poster, sorry!

--------------------
Dynamite with a laser beam...


Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator
Rate this thread

Jump to

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* 192K vs. 96K recording. Shahi 10/10/06 05:29 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. James T Bigglesworth   11/10/06 08:40 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. 4TrackMadman   11/10/06 06:31 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. ZukanModerator   10/10/06 04:10 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. dementedchord   11/10/06 03:46 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. semtex1974   10/10/06 03:53 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Anonymous   10/10/06 04:07 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. semtex1974   11/10/06 09:18 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Doublehelix   10/10/06 01:16 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Spord   10/10/06 03:20 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. tomafd   10/10/06 11:18 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. TAKEN.BALL.GONE.HOME   10/10/06 03:41 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. ghellquist   10/10/06 01:09 PM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. redleicester   10/10/06 09:36 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. John Willett   10/10/06 10:21 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. redleicester   10/10/06 11:13 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. James PerrettModerator   10/10/06 09:18 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. John Willett   10/10/06 09:04 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. ZukanModerator   10/10/06 08:36 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. The_Big_Piano_Player   10/10/06 10:50 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. John Willett   10/10/06 11:06 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. The_Big_Piano_Player   10/10/06 11:09 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Steve Hill   10/10/06 08:31 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Spord   10/10/06 07:36 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Peter Conz Connelly   10/10/06 08:46 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Dark Fader   10/10/06 09:11 AM
. * Re: 192K vs. 96K recording. Peter Conz Connelly   10/10/06 09:22 AM

Extra Information
1 registered and 68 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  David Etheridge, James Perrett, zenguitar, Martin Walker, Forum Admin, Hugh Robjohns, Zukan, Frank Eleveld, Will Betts,  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 3528

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Digital Editions | Privacy Policy | Support

May 2013
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for May 2013
Other recent issues:
DAW Tips from SOS
100s of great articles!
Cubase
Digital Performer
Live
Logic
Pro Tools
Reaper
Reason
Sonar
 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2013. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media