Q. Why use upsampling within plug-ins?

Published in SOS November 2012
Bookmark and Share

If high sample rates make no discernible difference when recording (which is effectively what Dan Lavry's much-quoted white paper seems to be saying), then what advantage is there in upsampling within plug-ins? For example, Cytomic's The Glue sounds better in the 4x upsampling mode, but why is this? And if working already at high sample rates in your DAW project, should upsampling make no difference at all?

Dan Lavry's white paper suggests that there is no benefit in recording audio at a higher sample rate than 96kHz. However, some plug-ins are reported to sound better when upsampling is applied and this is because their processing can be calculated more accurately.Dan Lavry's white paper suggests that there is no benefit in recording audio at a higher sample rate than 96kHz. However, some plug-ins are reported to sound better when upsampling is applied and this is because their processing can be calculated more accurately.Q. Why use upsampling within plug-ins?

Via SOS web site

SOS Technical Editor Hugh Robjohns replies: Lavry's basic premise is that there is no reliable evidence that the human population can perceive sounds higher than about 20kHz, and therefore that a sample rate in excess of about 44kHz should be entirely adequate for audio recording and reproduction, given a properly engineered system. Moreover, he highlights the fact that the temporal accuracy inherently diminishes with higher sample rates. For these reasons he argues that there is absolutely no benefit in recording with sample rates higher than about 96kHz, and that the optimal sample rate — not that we have the option to use it, sadly — is probably 60kHz to avoid some of the remaining practical engineering difficulties associated with 44.1kHz. However, we are talking here about recording and reproducing high-quality audio, which is a relatively straightforward thing. Complex non-linear signal processing — like dynamics and some forms of equalisation — is a whole different kettle of fish, and there are some significant mathematical advantages in converting to a higher sample rate for some forms of signal processing. This approach doesn't change the audio content in any way, it just makes the number crunching easier and considerably more accurate, with fewer unwanted artifacts. If you are already working at high sample rates, then further upsampling is unlikely to deliver any noticeable benefits, but only because it is very unlikely that there would be anything audibly significant in the upper parts of the captured spectrum anyway.  .


November 2014
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for November 2014
WIN Great Prizes in SOS Competitions!

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media