You are here

The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

All about the tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby CS70 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:48 pm

If you want an amplifier to create sine wave test tones, then the solid-state amp is supreme. But if you want to listen to Rachmaninoff, Sibelius, or Elvis, for me the classic old tube amp will communicate more dynamics and more music.

That makes little sense? From the (admittedly very little yet) that I get about this stuff, if anything a well designed solid state without transformer will have better transient response (faster and better slew rate ) than transformer-equipped tube amps? So more dynamics, not less?

I get that transformers can change the sound in a nice way, but that doesn't give you more dynamics, gives you a different sound..
User avatar
CS70
Jedi Poster
Posts: 4937
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:20 pm

CS70 wrote:That makes little sense?

He's not saying it's more accurate... just 'more musical' (in his opinion).

There is quite a large body of lobbyists that abhors the whole idea of negative feedback and the positive 'corrective' control that NFB brings, claiming it to be 'unnatural' and preferring instead the uncontrolled and more coloured alternative of amplification without (or with very little) negative feedback. They believe such systems are potentially 'more dynamic' (and they could be because the transients overshoot!), and 'more musical' (because of harmonic distortions).

Interesting that the natural world, and indeed ourselves as humans, are both crammed full of thousands of simple and extremely complex negative feedback loops....

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26278
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Martin Walker » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:21 pm

CS70 wrote:Do you have the first version of SieEQ Martin? I think they did made an update pretty early on to fix that kind of problem (cant remember if it was exactly that)

Bravo CS70 - just checked, and I had version 5.1.0 ,and have just downloaded and installed 5.3.2, which cures the problem. Thanks!

If only every developer implemented a 'check for updates' setting :headbang:

I'm still pleased that the Reaper meter range extension found this though ;)


Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 15130
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby uncleswede » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:30 pm

blinddrew wrote:2) change the waveform view from a linear display to a logarithmic display. To change this setting go to the actions menu, click on actions list and then search for Peaks:scale peaks by square root (half of range is 12dB rather than 6dB).

Excellent - that's a very handy Reaper tip :-)
uncleswede
New here
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:21 am

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Ariosto » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:39 pm

Personally It's digital every time for me. The only thing I miss is watching those large spools go round at 15 ips - very calming. But digital for my taste has all the warmth I want.
Ariosto
Frequent Poster
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 12:00 am
Location: LONDON, UK

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby The Elf » Thu Jan 16, 2020 6:44 pm

I'm constantly bemused by this idea of digital recording lacking 'warmth'. Record a source with 'warmth' to a decent digital system and you will hear that same 'warmth' on playback - whatever that term means to you. Digital recording simply captures, very precisely, what you give it - it doesn't remove something called 'warmth' before it records or replays it! :lol:
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 13718
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby CS70 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:13 pm

Ariosto wrote:Personally It's digital every time for me. The only thing I miss is watching those large spools go round at 15 ips - very calming. But digital for my taste has all the warmth I want.

Buy the Waves J37 tape emulation and you're all set!

Sounds really good as well.
User avatar
CS70
Jedi Poster
Posts: 4937
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby CS70 » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:18 pm

The Elf wrote:I'm constantly bemused by this idea of digital recording lacking 'warmth'. Record a source with 'warmth' to a decent digital system and you will hear that same 'warmth' on playback - whatever that term means to you. Digital recording simply captures, very precisely, what you give it - it doesn't remove something called 'warmth' before it records or replays it! :lol:

Indeed. It always surprises me how so many people can pluck conclusions out of thin air without realizing what makes and opinion worth having.

If they go about the rest of their life the same way they go about audio recording.. no wonder the world goes the way it does :D
User avatar
CS70
Jedi Poster
Posts: 4937
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:25 pm

Ariosto wrote:The only thing I miss is watching those large spools go round at 15 ips - very calming.

Not when the left-hand one is going round really quickly and there's still three pages of score to get through.... :ooo:

But digital for my taste has all the warmth I want.

If it's a warm sounding source, it comes back sounding warm from a digital recording.

I guess some people relied on tape to make the track sound warm, making up for a poor mic selection or a thin-sounding source.

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26278
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby The Elf » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:30 pm

Hugh Robjohns wrote:I guess some people relied on tape to make the track sound warm, making up for a poor mic selection or a thin-sounding source.
I could go along with that, if were not for the strong feeling I get that most of these folk seeking 'warmth' have never even stood in front of a tape machine, let alone recorded with one! :lol:
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 13718
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Trevor Johnson » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:45 pm

I could go along with that, if were not for the strong feeling I get that most of these folk seeking 'warmth' have never even stood in front of a tape machine, let alone recorded with one!

My Revox G36 has plenty of natural warmth from all those valve heaters!

Apparently, there is renewed interest in the rather esoteric end of Hi-Fi, for pre-recorded tapes. Labels like 'Chasing the Dragon', 'Opus 3', etc., offer pre-recorded tapes - but at prices for the former from £360 to £600 for each one. (The first thing I would do would be to transfer them to digital........)
Trevor Johnson
Regular
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 12:00 am

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby James Perrett » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:03 pm

There's definitely something about hearing music from a big tape machine and listening to the big Otari often brings a smile to my face - but it is a smile of relief as much as anything, knowing that all the channel cards are working and it hasn't blown another set of fuses!
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 8873
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:20 pm

:lol: ... And the relief that it's not making that horrible squealing noise that inicates the tape's lubricant is scraping off on the guides and heads! :shocked:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26278
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby Tim Gillett » Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:02 am

Trevor Johnson wrote:
I could go along with that, if were not for the strong feeling I get that most of these folk seeking 'warmth' have never even stood in front of a tape machine, let alone recorded with one!

My Revox G36 has plenty of natural warmth from all those valve heaters!

Apparently, there is renewed interest in the rather esoteric end of Hi-Fi, for pre-recorded tapes. Labels like 'Chasing the Dragon', 'Opus 3', etc., offer pre-recorded tapes - but at prices for the former from £360 to £600 for each one. (The first thing I would do would be to transfer them to digital........)

I think an earlier producer of such pre recorded tapes was "tape project". It's an interesting phenomenon of people paying large sums for the privilege of adding an extra generation of tape noise and distortion to an existing master when for a pittance you could buy the CD or download and avoid those generation losses, which is what most people do.

Compare that to the other seeming trend of record companies going back to not just the 2 track mixdown tape for digital reissue, but further back to digitising the multitracks and remixing them for digital release.

The two trends perfectly cancel each other out! But what choice we have.
Tim Gillett
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:00 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: The insecurity of small waveforms on your DAW

Postby blinddrew » Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:21 am

"What a fascinating modern age we live in."
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 9447
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

PreviousNext