You are here

Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

All about the tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby w oxo cube » Fri Nov 20, 2020 7:36 pm

Hey,

I’m aware that when choosing an audio interface there are various consideration to take into account. How many in’s and out’s, thunderbolt or USB, pre amps etc etc. But simply regarding subjective audio quality how much of a gap is there between something fairly cost effective like a MOTU M4 or SSL 2+ compared with a 3k + Prism or an Apogee Symphony? Obviously the more expensive one has more features but is it night and day listening to the two side by side.

Best Ox
w oxo cube
Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: W Yorks

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby desmond » Fri Nov 20, 2020 7:46 pm

This concept of "night and day" when describing stuff on the internet is troubling to me. One person's "night and day" to someone else is "it sounds basically the same but there are subtle differences". That aside:-

Even budget audio interfaces having decent enough sound quality, but there will be those with more discerning ears and more sophisticated featured requirements.

Generally though, the price-quality equation means you start paying for a basic level of features and quality, and those things rise as the price increases, but then there gets a point when increasing costs have a smaller and smaller improvement in subjective quality, or even in specs, a lot of the time.

If you compare a low cost interface to a high end one, and aren't looking at the supported features - *if* you have a great studio environment and have experienced ears, you will likely detect differences, but even then they are likely to be subtle.
User avatar
desmond
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10673
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 1:00 am
mu:zines | music magazine archive | difficultAudio

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby CS70 » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:09 pm

w oxo cube wrote:Hey,

I’m aware that when choosing an audio interface there are various consideration to take into account. How many in’s and out’s, thunderbolt or USB, pre amps etc etc. But simply regarding subjective audio quality how much of a gap is there between something fairly cost effective like a MOTU M4 or SLL + compared with a 3k + Prism or an Apogee symphony. Obviously the more expensive one have more feature but is it night and day listening to the two side by side.

Best Ox

What Desmond says. No night and day. Not even noon vs. one o'clock. More like 12:00 and 12:01.

I'd go as far as saying that 95% of the people doing mixing won't notice and certainly 100% of the (not-paying) listening public.

Better converters, less noisy and distorting preamps, better clocks etc may lead to a slight increase in your capability of reaching for details when mixing and bring them out.

But it's critical to understand that you have to have good details in the first place - so all the steps of the chain before must be perfect: great music, great singers, great recording space, great microphones in a great position... then you may gain a slight advantage, in some rare circumstances and with specific sounds.

Of course having the best tools at your disposal is nice.

But let's put it like this: a UAD Twin is good enough for Andrew Scheps, it's good enough for anybody.
User avatar
CS70
Jedi Poster
Posts: 6510
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby RichardT » Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:14 pm

My experience is mostly with DACs rather than ADCs. I have found there can be a big difference between them. For example, the Mytek Brooklyn is better than the Chord
Mojo which is much better than the NI Komplete 6.

For me these differences are worth paying for. I was without the Brooklyn for a while and used a Chord Mojo instead. When I got the Brooklyn back, all the subtlety was restored and I felt I was really hearing the music again.

I suspect this might have more to do with the analogue stages in the DACs than the converters, but I don’t know that for sure.

I think you need to audition some examples at different prices if you can.
RichardT
Regular
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:00 am
Location: London UK

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby Martin Walker » Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:40 pm

RichardT wrote:My experience is mostly with DACs rather than ADCs. I have found there can be a big difference between them. For example, the Mytek Brooklyn is better than the Chord Mojo which is much better than the NI Komplete 6.

...I think you need to audition some examples at different prices if you can.

I totally agree about auditioning if you can Rich, and was lucky enough to carry out some comparative tests for SOS some years back, which I wrote about here:

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/3- ... s-compared

I could and still can hear the differences, and am still using the Lavry DA10 DAC I bought as a result, but I personally think they ARE subtle differences that you may only hear in full if you've got good monitor speakers. You've obviously got a revealing playback system ;)


Martin
User avatar
Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 16654
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby w oxo cube » Sun Nov 22, 2020 3:34 pm

Thanks, some interesting points here. I absolutely accept that the night and day analogy doesn't really hold up. It was a crude attempt to try to bring real word application and experience to the world of words and technical specs.

My situation is that I need to buy a new mac in the fairly near future and with all indication pointing to the fact that it won't be supported it looks like i will have to retire my RME FW400.

I'm not wanting to take a backwards step in audio quality so was trying to gauge the overall level of sound quality on newer interfaces as mine own is 12 years old.

Thanks and best wishes
OX
w oxo cube
Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: W Yorks

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby rggillespie » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:53 am

A RME fireface400 owner here and I was wondering if an upgrade would be an idea. I was finding the mic inputs a little noisy on quiet sources and bland sounding generally. I decided to get a mic pre and use that for the mic gain and its been a big hit with me. As the RME is reliable I'm happy to keep it going but I have the new flexibility of the mic pre for DI'd signals and plenty of gain for a ribbon mic too. Its been a noticeable improvement and gives me more flexibility.
rggillespie
Regular
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:24 am

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby ken long » Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:52 pm

w oxo cube wrote:how much of a gap is there between something fairly cost effective like a MOTU M4 or SSL 2+ compared with a 3k + Prism or an Apogee Symphony?

I'd say there's a noticeable gap in performance between a entry level MOTU and say, Prismsound Dream. There's even a subtle difference between the latter and the "budget" Lyra or Titan.

Is it worth the difference in cost? Depends on your budget and application.

"Night and Day" is usually an overstatement.
User avatar
ken long
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 3390
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:00 am
Location: Somers Town
I'm All Ears.

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby w oxo cube » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:23 pm

rggillespie wrote:A RME fireface400 owner here and I was wondering if an upgrade would be an idea. I was finding the mic inputs a little noisy on quiet sources and bland sounding generally. I decided to get a mic pre and use that for the mic gain and its been a big hit with me. As the RME is reliable I'm happy to keep it going but I have the new flexibility of the mic pre for DI'd signals and plenty of gain for a ribbon mic too. Its been a noticeable improvement and gives me more flexibility.


The pre's are very clean I must admit and I think adding a pre amp is a great move. What did you get out of interest

I may have spoken too soon re the silicon mac obsolescence situation as there is some interesting talk on the RME forum.

Fingers crossed as it's a rock solid unit.
w oxo cube
Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: W Yorks

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby James Perrett » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:20 pm

w oxo cube wrote:I may have spoken too soon re the silicon mac obsolescence situation as there is some interesting talk on the RME forum.

I've certainly heard of other Firewire audio interfaces being used on modern Macs with Thunderbolt to Firewire adaptors.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 9932
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby w oxo cube » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:27 am

It's looking promising, there was talk that the new silicon macs didn't have firewire drivers so it wasn't going to be possible however this from the RME forum

"The Mac FireWire driver (3.39) works under Big Sur as does the former USB driver (3.19). Only PCIe and TB needed changes. M1 drivers for FireWire will be checked as soon as we received a unit with TB port. The developer preview unit that we got had only USB"
w oxo cube
Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: W Yorks

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby rggillespie » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 am

'The pre's are very clean I must admit and I think adding a pre amp is a great move. What did you get out of interest' Its a solution that's worked well for me, after reading the reviews and looking around I went for cranbourne one in the end. Its two channel sounds super good I think and is a clear upgrade on the 400 mic pre's. Its most obvious recording my bass direct, that was ok before but it's fair leap forward now. Everywhere else it shines vocals, acoustics etc and feeling its right from the off, I'm processing whatever's been recorded less now. The mic pre has enough options to shape things to an extent, but I use it clean most often and am very happy with it. Hopefully an Apple solution is there for you, it's an irritant to have to buy new due to software upgrades :roll:
rggillespie
Regular
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:24 am

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby w oxo cube » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:28 pm

The Cranbourne gets a lot of love round theses parts and looks like great value.

I'm looking for something myself that slightly rounds off the transients and gives a little bit of a vibe.
w oxo cube
Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: W Yorks

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby Kwackman » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:31 pm

w oxo cube wrote:I'm looking for something myself that slightly rounds off the transients and gives a little bit of a vibe.

If I had an audio interface that "rounds off the transients", it would be sent back pretty quickly and something else bought!
User avatar
Kwackman
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1998
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Belfast
Cubase, guitars.

Re: Comparable audio quality of audio interfaces.

Postby blinddrew » Wed Nov 25, 2020 10:33 pm

Kwackman wrote:
w oxo cube wrote:I'm looking for something myself that slightly rounds off the transients and gives a little bit of a vibe.

If I had an audio interface that "rounds off the transients", it would be sent back pretty quickly and something else bought!
I think w oxo cube is talking about the pre-amp rather than the interface at this point.

maybe.
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12094
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Next