Hugh Robjohns wrote:... at which point the gloriously rich, colourful, dramatic sunset we thought we were about to record suddenly looked very ordinary, flat and boring! :headbang:
You had just discovered Instagram! :D
Moderator: Moderators
Hugh Robjohns wrote:... at which point the gloriously rich, colourful, dramatic sunset we thought we were about to record suddenly looked very ordinary, flat and boring! :headbang:
CS70 wrote:Arpangel wrote:I used to think that if it sounds good where you’re standing, then that’s where the microphones should go, as the mic’s should pick up what I’m hearing.
It's a good starting point, but it works if "sounds good" is "sounds good thru monitoring or you are listening to a recording taken in that position"!
If you evaluate positions moving the mic with your headphones on, while well insulated from the room sound, it gives you a starting point quite quickly.
Hugh Robjohns wrote::lol: Yes -- it's learning to interpret what you actually hear and translate that, based on experience, to what you imagine the mics will capture.... and usually then fudging the mics about a bit more after discovering what they are really delivering through the speakers (or headphones)... :D
Sam Spoons wrote:An afternoon doing test recordings to find the best mic positions for the marimba without the pressure of trying to record a piece might be time well spent (when we are allowed to that is). Then keep records so you can repeat the setup when you meet up to do some 'proper' recording.
Sam Spoons wrote:That complicates matters, obviously you'll need to repeat for different miked instruments. Apologies for teaching Granny to suck eggs :)