Hugh Robjohns wrote:Hmmm.... It does... But only if you use appropriate equipment appropriately and know what to do with it.
Well, that’s me out then.
:D
Moderator: Moderators
Hugh Robjohns wrote:Hmmm.... It does... But only if you use appropriate equipment appropriately and know what to do with it.
Arpangel wrote:Hugh Robjohns wrote:Hmmm.... It does... But only if you use appropriate equipment appropriately and know what to do with it.
Well, that’s me out then.
:D
Folderol wrote:Well I've mentioned the UHER here, and several other places. If you want it, it's yours for whatever you offer more than the cost of postage - with half a dozen tapes thrown in, and a set of replacement belts. It worked last time I tried it, which was something like 6 months ago.John Stafford wrote:I would dearly love a nice reel-to-reel. It's absolutely not necessary, and it doesn't make any sense at all, but none of the things I love make any sense. :beamup:
If nobody ever claims it, then with great reluctance it will eventually have to go to the dump.
jimjazzdad wrote:If I was on the right side of the pond, I'd have been all over Folderol's offer. As it is, I'm glad that the Uher is going to find a good home. I don't know if its a bit of a no-no to promote other forums here, but there is lots of support for reel to reels of all makes over at Tapeheads.net - a mix of techies and oxide apostles.
While I will never stop using my digital gear as my primary, there IS something about tape. Maybe its just a romantic notion coupled with selective amnesia. I still own, and occasionally use, a Tascam 32, a Teac A-3340S and a Teac A-3300SX. I gave my 'spare' A-3340S to my son.
4TrackMadman wrote:16ch 2inch was gold. Best sound quality for rock/metal IMO.