You are here

Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

Page 1 of 1

Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:42 pm
by Parco
Full freq. range reverb like this?
https://soundcloud.com/parcolee/wheneve ... ush-reverb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EUU_Xppg9w

Or just keeping the 200Hz - 5000Hz freq. of reverb and filtering all the rest like this?
https://soundcloud.com/parcolee/wheneve ... red-reverb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6jj30V4pXI

I think the filtered one sounds closer but the full range one sounds similar as the Maxwell's one. :beamup:

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:12 pm
by Dave B
Some reverbs do have high and low pass filters - the Eventide 2016 Room reverb certainly does. For me, I tend to put an eq in to remove highs and lows before the reverb if I don't have appropriate control in the reverb plugin. So, either way, I still filter the signal hitting it.

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:46 pm
by ken long
I've just acquired a long time want in the shape of a PCM60. So at the moment nothing gets filtered and I tend to drown everything in it. I'm sure I will settle down to a conservative setting with treble contour on :)

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:48 pm
by Martin Walker
Dave B wrote:For me, I tend to put an eq in to remove highs and lows before the reverb if I don't have appropriate control in the reverb plugin. So, either way, I still filter the signal hitting it.

+1

You really do need EQ some way or another with reverb.


Martin

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:48 pm
by ken long
Parco wrote:
I think the filtered one sounds closer but the full range one sounds similar as the Maxwell's one. :beamup:

I prefer the full fat version myself.

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:25 pm
by CS70
On the main reverbs usually I put some hi and lo pass filters, and sometimes shape the response. On track-specific, it depends on the content. for example in a vocal track there's little to reverberate in the low end so I may well not bother

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:38 pm
by James Perrett
I also like reverbs with different time constants for high and low frequencies.

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:08 pm
by Bob Bickerton
I prefer something like the UAD Lexicon 224 for most applications.

Image

Manipulation of decay time over frequency bands works best for me.

Bob

Re: Which ways of reverb application do you prefer? filtered one or the full range one?

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:17 pm
by Sam Inglis
It totally depends on the application. On a snare drum, anything goes. On a solo violin, less so.