Okay, help. I've mastered my stereo final to -18 LUFS. I like how it sounds, and I like how it looks. Nothing's been abused in the making of this one. As Borat would say: 'N-i-c-e.'
Now I want to upload it to Youtube, which seems nowadays to have a reference level of -14 LUFS. (I'm out of touch - it might even haven changed in the last year.)
Easy question: What do I do? Limit and boost to -14 LUFS?
You are here
Limit and boost?
Moderator: Moderators
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
awjoe - Frequent Poster (Level2)
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:00 am
Well, maybe I could take one for the team. But no pictures.
Re: Limit and boost?
Last time I checked YT did not turn up quiet songs (might have changed, you need to check on the site), so yes, if you upload it quiet, it will stay quiet.
Bring it up! There's zero problems in having it a little louder than the expected LUFS - if the song is well mixed it will be gained down a little but it will still sounds good!
Bring it up! There's zero problems in having it a little louder than the expected LUFS - if the song is well mixed it will be gained down a little but it will still sounds good!
-
CS70 - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 7315
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video and the FB page
Re: Limit and boost?
You don't actually need to do anything. Most streaming systems will make any required adjustments automatically -- although some (and I think YT might be one of them) wont turn up tracks that are already below the target loudness.
For future reference, I think -18LUFS is a little on the low side. -16LUFS is probably a better target for streamer consistency -- and it is the AES recommedation too.
However, I think it is generally a good idea to take control of as much of the process as you can, just to avoid any surprises. So... if your track's integrated loudness is -18LUFS and you think the streaming service target is -14LUFS, you're theoretically 4dB too quiet.
If you want to resolve that, simply boosting your track's overall level by 4dB will sort it... However, you do need to be mindful of the True Peak level of the track because if it was previously -1dBTP, you've now got a good 3dB of overload on transient peaks.
Whether that's audible or not depends on the style of music to some extent, but it's probably not desirable. Some streamers will limit that for you, but if you do it you have the control.
If your music has a lot of loud transient peaks it's probably easiest to use a limiter to catch them (set the limit to -1dBTP and boost the input level by 4dB) -- as you say. But if it's just a few occasional peaks, some internal editing to help reign them back might be better.
And while I mention the -1dBTP maximum which is what most streamers demand, there is a strong argument in favour of a more conservative peak limit of -3dBTP as that doesn't stress the lossy codecs so much. (And the reduction of transient peaks by 2dB is inaudible)
For future reference, I think -18LUFS is a little on the low side. -16LUFS is probably a better target for streamer consistency -- and it is the AES recommedation too.
However, I think it is generally a good idea to take control of as much of the process as you can, just to avoid any surprises. So... if your track's integrated loudness is -18LUFS and you think the streaming service target is -14LUFS, you're theoretically 4dB too quiet.
If you want to resolve that, simply boosting your track's overall level by 4dB will sort it... However, you do need to be mindful of the True Peak level of the track because if it was previously -1dBTP, you've now got a good 3dB of overload on transient peaks.
Whether that's audible or not depends on the style of music to some extent, but it's probably not desirable. Some streamers will limit that for you, but if you do it you have the control.
If your music has a lot of loud transient peaks it's probably easiest to use a limiter to catch them (set the limit to -1dBTP and boost the input level by 4dB) -- as you say. But if it's just a few occasional peaks, some internal editing to help reign them back might be better.
And while I mention the -1dBTP maximum which is what most streamers demand, there is a strong argument in favour of a more conservative peak limit of -3dBTP as that doesn't stress the lossy codecs so much. (And the reduction of transient peaks by 2dB is inaudible)
-
Hugh Robjohns - Moderator
- Posts: 30074
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
In my world, things get less strange when I read the manual...
Re: Limit and boost?
Have you tried the Loudness Penalty site to see what YT will actually do?
- Matt Houghton
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor
Re: Limit and boost?
Have you tried the Loudness Penalty site to see what YT will actually do?
Use this all the time- very helpful for me at any rate!
- IAA
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:00 am
Re: Limit and boost?
Thank you so much, everyone. Very helpful.
-
awjoe - Frequent Poster (Level2)
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:00 am
Well, maybe I could take one for the team. But no pictures.