You are here

Unhappy SoundCloud

Advice on everything from getting your music heard to setting up a label and royalties.

Unhappy SoundCloud

Postby ConcertinaChap » Sun Jul 16, 2017 2:07 pm

Well, according to this story in the Register all is not quite as it could be there:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/1 ... not_dying/

CC
User avatar
ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 9010
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
A full wine rack is a happy wine rack.
 

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Dave B » Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:42 pm

Yes, it's been doing the rounds all this week. I shall be very sad if Soundcloud does go - it's an excellent service for those of us who don't pay for it.

In many ways, I'm still surprised that it's free. TBH, if they told me 10-20quid a year for what I have now, I'd fork out. It's been rock solid and reliable for me. But then, I'm not exactly a power user.

Current thinking is that someone like Amazon or Google will snap it up in it's upcoming Christmas Sale. Hopefully someone who sees the benefit in keeping it broadly what it already is rather than forcing us onto an inferior platform.

Wait and see mode engaged
User avatar
Dave B
Jedi Poster
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Maidenhead
Veni, Vidi, Aesculi (I came, I saw, I conkered)

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 16, 2017 4:18 pm

Dave B wrote: - it's an excellent service for those of us who don't pay for it.

In many ways, I'm still surprised that it's free. TBH, if they told me 10-20quid a year for what I have now, I'd fork out. It's been rock solid and reliable for me. But then, I'm not exactly a power user.

Exactly, I'd willingly pay for the privilige , felt like this the last time they were in trouble, so will def do so if and when, industry needs to get behind them, straight forward, no nonense, very important site for up and coming , brilliant easy way to share files/music/ideas, good for promotion too, down to the individual to attract traffic, all the big name dance acts are on there.

Sending out an SOS, Save Our Soundcloud.
Guest

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Scramble » Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:16 pm

LdashD wrote:Exactly, I'd willingly pay for the privilige , felt like this the last time they were in trouble, so will def do so if and when, industry needs to get behind them, straight forward, no nonense, very important site for up and coming , brilliant easy way to share files/music/ideas, good for promotion too, down to the individual to attract traffic, all the big name dance acts are on there.

You've been able to pay for Soundcloud for quite a long time now. £5 a month for some extra features, £8 a month for even more.

One of the problems with Soundcloud for me is that you couldn't re-order your tracks, unless you went for the paid upgrade. Which means that the free version is unusable for anything semi-serious, but £60 a year is not worth it for what is quite a bare-bones, visually boring site.
Scramble
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2468
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 12:00 am

 


Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:58 pm

Scramble wrote:You've been able to pay for Soundcloud for quite a long time now. £5 a month for some extra features, £8 a month for even more.

One of the problems with Soundcloud for me is that you couldn't re-order your tracks, unless you went for the paid upgrade. Which means that the free version is unusable for anything semi-serious, but £60 a year is not worth it for what is quite a bare-bones, visually boring site.


Yeah I know, but you know it’s free innit?

I mean if they appealed, or if someone with clout started a petition whatever.

For starters, the likes of me, with hardly any listens could be charge a quid, 50p a track whatever… that’s almost free and now I think about it, it would prob remove a lot of crap in the process too, not mine of course.

One man’s bland… I like it, don’t want no bleedin’ biographies, if I dig it I’ll dig deeper, it’s easy on the eye and the tracks are laid out in front of you, the pic may even entice you, I’m only interested in the music, couldn’t give a monkey’s wot the possibly sensitive precious artist thinks or likes etc, lets ‘ear the music first.

It’s unobtrusive, I’ve never had one spam email from them, only emails when they changed something, they’ve been hanging by a thread for yonks, industry don’t like ‘em I suppose cos it’s free, I’m only guessing, wot I’ve read, but they seem like decent sorts…

Black Bladder should get on their case an’ earn ‘imself a few bob in the process.
Guest

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Dave B » Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:54 pm

Scramble - hear you on that one. This is where a lot of sites seem to fall down : bad pricing policies. If someone gave me a bare bones site with sensible functionality for a cheap price, I'd pay it and I suspect that I wouldn't be alone. But 60quid? For something that I use occasionally to host stuff that I can put elsewhere. It's a great platform and I'd be happy to bung them _something_ for it, but let's get real here.
User avatar
Dave B
Jedi Poster
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Maidenhead
Veni, Vidi, Aesculi (I came, I saw, I conkered)

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Biodiode » Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:08 pm

It would be sad if it does go, as I have almost 80 tracks hosted by them. I decided to back them up to Orfium just in case things do turn for the worst as I don't fancy individually uploading those again.

I could however never understand why soundcloud was in essence a free service. I am sure any serious musician, amateur or professional, would be willing to pay a few quid a month. Look at how cloud storage works, 15gb free then if you want 100gb more you pay a £1.99 a month.
Biodiode
Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Costa Del Blackpool
http://www.biodiode.com

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Chaconne » Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:45 pm

The dumb thing is that soundcloud has been a success culturally- and this is often just an accident and something you cant bottle.
Luckily I pay what I started paying being an early adopter - and being able to alter what the top tracks are is central to its function.

Someone needed to understand what soundcloud had become, the No 1 site for producers, and be happy with that. Not worry about Spotify, iTunes or anything else - this is for producers, which is an amazing unique selling point being able to communicate and get occasional free stuff and be in touch with music at the cutting edge.

But you could see this was not enough by the stupidity of not realising that the ability to put new work or 'hits' at the top of the page was a basic must have - not a luxury. People 'click by' and need to be wowed instantly. Thinking you could fleece people for this was just rude basically and betrayed a basic inability to empathise with how music online works.

I will be very sad if it goes - a site for hosting music with no adverts that became 'the new myspace' - only a group of incompetents would mess with that, but its just this madness that takes over people wanting to take over the effing world when all anybody wants is a simple space.
Chaconne
Frequent Poster
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Oxford

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Guest » Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:49 am

They could open it up for licensing tracks to Companies, big and small, sign up to it through email, let companies/individuals trawl through Soundcloud, one universal fee across the board, or similar, even commissions… no extra paid promoting, just the luck of the draw, just like life itself, a lottery… I got loadsa stuff I’d stick up for that kinda deal, or if they must, make us pay for that service, not me though.

I like that you’re confronted with a big pic of a waveform, you can see the drops and you can scroll thru to them whatever, it’s the music that’s important after all.

Like Youtube it’s become a cultural storage medium, a museum, a music gallery, all the worlds unsigned music (& more) stored and freely accessible and all in one place, brill for us, brill for the world, if not Soundcloud then something else the same, or very very similar.
Guest

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby James Perrett » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:56 am

I've always felt that they've had a bit of a deathwish. It is a great idea but I've found that it can be cumbersome to use at times and slow to load. Lately they've been insisting that I install their app if I want to listen to tracks on my phone or tablet - so I've given up following Soundcloud links most of the time.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 9699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby johnny h » Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:09 am

They've spend a ludicrous amount of money building luxury offices in some of the most expensive cities in the world. And for what? The site looks pretty much identical to how it did 5 years ago and the mobile app is still crap.

I don't want them to disappear but the management the last few years has been absolutely terrible.
johnny h
Jedi Poster
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:00 am

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Forum Admin » Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:29 pm

I'm sure no musicians who use it (SOS does) want SoundCloud to disappear, but as a business owner I've never fathomed why on earth they needed 420 employees!?

Their hosting costs must be astronomical, with so many users/tracks, and no inkling of how many tracks will get uploaded tomorrow by their customers, in one month's time etc - a total nightmare to do any forecasting.

@James - I understand the upload speed for free accounts is well below what it is for their paid accounts.
User avatar
Forum Admin
Moderator
Posts: 3393
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:00 pm
Location: A studio deep in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire, UK
SEARCH 11,489 SOS Reviews/Techniques articles: www.soundonsound.com/search

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby James Perrett » Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:47 pm

Forum Admin wrote:@James - I understand the upload speed for free accounts is well below what it is for their paid accounts.

I was thinking of the time I have to wait before I can play anything if I go to one of their pages. My upload speed is pretty dire anyway so I probably wouldn't have noticed Soundcloud being slow. Their continued use of Flash also causes problems sometimes.
User avatar
James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 9699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Forum Admin » Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:03 pm

James Perrett wrote:Their continued use of Flash also causes problems sometimes.

I don't have Flash enabled on Safari and can play anyone's SoundCloud tracks perfectly OK. AFAIK they implemented HTML5 a few years ago.

Try setting your browser to block Flash when on www.soundcloud.com and see if that improves matters?
User avatar
Forum Admin
Moderator
Posts: 3393
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:00 pm
Location: A studio deep in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire, UK
SEARCH 11,489 SOS Reviews/Techniques articles: www.soundonsound.com/search

Re: Unhappy Soundcloud

Postby Scramble » Mon Jul 17, 2017 3:10 pm

James Perrett wrote:Soundcloud being slow. Their continued use of Flash also causes problems sometimes.

I find this too, on some browsers.
Scramble
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2468
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 12:00 am

 


Next