You are here

Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Post your own hardware/software reviews.

Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby tommyzai » Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:46 pm

Note: I am working on an article and maybe even a video about the confusion, difficulty, and torment in choosing the right digital audio workstation for your needs. One focus will be on the DAWs that I consider under-appreciated underdogs . . . dark horses. Harrison Mixbus is one of them! In my opinion, more musicians, producers, etc. should be using this fine piece of software, and hopefully what I wrote below inspires more investigation.

INTRO
Harrison Mixbus v5 is a consumer level digital audio workstation for recording, editing, mixing, and mastering that takes a unique approach in comparison to the other choices on the market. Not too long ago, many users recorded in another DAW and used Mixbus for mixing. That’s changed, or at least should change! Mixbus is now a full-featured DAW that is capable of helping users of all genres complete a project; however, it’s clearly geared toward recording and mixing audio. The intention is transparent. It’s called, “Mixbus,” and it’s created by Harrison, a world leader in professional large format consoles. If the name isn’t enough, take a look at the interface. It’s modded after Harrison’s very own hardware. Yet, all DAWs have their own look and vibe. They all have a story and a reason for existing. But what really sets Mixbus apart is the sound. There have been countless comparisons between the major workstations, and the consensus is THEY ALL SOUND THE SAME . . . except one . . . Mixbus! Harrison utilizes an “analog paradigm that embodies form, function, and sound.” This DAW looks, feels, operates, and sounds like the analog mixer. The results are wonderful. I have a home studio with budget monitors, and I can hear the difference. I can only imagine a comparison on a high-end system.

Disclaimer: Anyone in any genre can use anything and make great music. You wouldn’t believe how I recorded my favorite tracks. However, there’s no denying that certain workstations favor certain genres.


Who Should Use This?
Those using mostly live instruments and vocals, who want a “real” studio look, feel, workflow and sound — this is as close as you’re gonna get in the virtual world. Those who lean on “found” loops, e.g., Hip Hop, Trip Hop, etc. It has powerful tools for deep audio editing. Note: Mixbus’ midi handling has come a long way. It’s certainly capable and has all the essential tools.

Who Should Look Elsewhere?
Those who work exclusively in MIDI and require deep editing. Those who like to work in clips instead of linearly. DJs.

Tommy Zai’s Top Ten Reasons To Use This DAW (not in any particular order)

1. The sound is big, fat, punchy, and warm.
2. No iLok or other annoying protection — uses license files.
3. Attractive, customizable interface with a smooth, user-friendly workflow.
4. Channel strips have built-in high-pass filter and three different EQ bands (low, mid, and high) and “Drive” controls for analog emulation to beef things up.
5. Simulated analog mixing features a sweet in-line compressor with three modes.
6. Master has tone controls, compressor/limiter, and tape saturation for global FX during mix-down.
7. VCA faders are easy to slide and very responsive. The levels don’t jump all over the place. — they’re silky and smooth.
8. VU meters are accurate, responsive, and easy to read.
9. Harrison knows what’s needed to record, mix, and master a great track.
10. Bargain price!!!

Other Reasons This DAW Is Cool
• The whole thing looks bigger than I remember, but maybe it’s my eyes.
• Easy to add and tag plugins.
• Resizable transport controls, editing tools, playback modes, counters, etc. are neatly lined-up on top.
• Time-line view.
• Tempo mapping.
• Named buses (convenient and time-saving).
• Bus sends with on/off buttons.
• Real mixer with one knob per function design.
• Channels can be independently resized via toggling between narrow and wide.
• Spill buttons on the mix bus channel.
• Spectral analysis tool is a nice surprise feature.
• CPU will not overload and get sluggish when you decide to adjust channel strip processing as this is “pre-allocated” into host resources.
• I read somewhere that the ‘optimize polarity’ feature is great, but I never used it . . . need to check it out.
• Sharing and Exporting.
• Well-written manual found online that is downloadable as a PDF.
• Mac, PC, and Linux. Switching computers won’t matter. ;-)

Cons
• Even though this beast has unlimited this and that, users should conserve resources as it’s more CPU hungry than some other DAWs. From what I understand, this is due to the analog stuff going on under the hood. This is no big deal for me as I grew up using a Tascam Porta Studio One with only four tracks. I’m no stranger to being a miser. However, if you like to work big and/or messy, you better have a powerful processor that can handle your clutter. ;-)
• Great built-in FX and the add-ons are top-notch (Essentials bundle provides delay and reverb; Character bundle offers plug-ins for drums, bass and vocal processing); yet, you won’t be wowed by dozens of on-board virtual instruments. You’ll have to use your 3rd party synths, but if you’re like me you probably would anyway!
• Favors larger screens.

Hey, what about Mixbus 32C?
Mixbus 32C has enhanced features, is an exact emulation of specific board, and cost more. As far as basic features and functions, these two versions are quite similar. There are slight differences that may or may not help users decide between the two. For example:

• Mixbus has three-band EQ; Mixbus 32C is designed after a different Harrison console that has four-band with the switchable top band between shelving and peaking. It also consists of both high-pass and low-pass filters.
• Mixbus has eight stereo mix buses; Mixbus 32C has 12.
• 32C offers more audio routing options.
• The sound! Mixbus is modeled after the general sound of Harrison consoles; 32C is modeled after that specific unit.

SUMMARY
In 1966, The Beatles stopped touring and began using the studio as a musical instrument. This was ground-breaking at the time. With the Fab Four in mind, Mixbus is extremely musical. It’s also user-friendly and easy to navigate. I dig the look, feel, and sound. It’s both nostalgic and cutting-edge modern. In short, it’s a fun platform to use. Completing a sweet sounding song seems more reachable than with many other workstations. Will it, “forever change the way [I] think about mixing in the box?” Not sure yet, but it just might!! For now, I’m having fun with Mixbus, and I highly recommend that you check it out. They offer a free demo version. Way to go, Harrison!!
User avatar
tommyzai
Poster
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:00 am
I am Tommy Zai!

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby blinddrew » Tue Dec 03, 2019 11:00 pm

I was very tempted by Mixbus because, as you mention, the sound is genuinely different. In the end though I decided I was better of spending my time building my knowledge of my main DAW rather than trying to learn another one. :)
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8455
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby tommyzai » Wed Dec 04, 2019 1:14 am

blinddrew wrote: . . . In the end though I decided I was better of spending my time building my knowledge of my main DAW rather than trying to learn another one. :)

This has been a difficult decision for many. I plan on doing a lo-fi vid on choosing the best DAW for you and your needs. If your current DAW suits you and your workflow, stick with it. If not, it's worth checking out others . . . MixBus if you dig the virtual tactile vibe and built in warmth. Best of luck to you, My Friend. Make great tracks and have fun . . . regardless of which DAW you use.
User avatar
tommyzai
Poster
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:00 am
I am Tommy Zai!

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby OneWorld » Wed Dec 04, 2019 2:14 am

The decison was really easy for me - it kept crashing, sluggish and as yu say - a CPU hog
OneWorld
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2664
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:00 am

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby Funkyflash5 » Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:13 am

I've been using 32c for the last 2 years, and my only issue has been the amount of screen space it wants to really look it's best. I'm looking to get a 42" 4k tv to use as a monitor to solve this, but even as is with a single 24" 1080p screen it's totally workable.
As for performance, even on a 6 year old machine, it handled a live session with 19 tracks simultaneously without trouble. I haven't had reason to push it further than that, but I have yet to even need to think about managing resources when tracking or mixing.

My favorite special feature is the polarity maximizer which makes dealing with phase in a multi-mic drum setup super easy!
Funkyflash5
Poster
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:43 am
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby CS70 » Wed Dec 04, 2019 5:57 pm

tommyzai wrote:I am working on an article and maybe even a video about the confusion, difficulty, and torment in choosing the right digital audio workstation for your needs.

Frankly I would think that anybody having that problem is a little misguided?

There's so little difference in what the various DAW do and how they do it nowadays, that it's really about grabbing the one which is nearest to you or leveraging anything you know a little. And cost, of course. Most of the meat is in what additional tools you get, for example if I get Melodyne or VocalSync or not (or equivalent tools) makes quite a difference.

Granted, Mixbus is a little different because of the built-in crosstalk but if you know what it is and you're looking for it, it's easy to reproduce.

Just my $.01.
User avatar
CS70
Jedi Poster
Posts: 4448
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Oslo, Norway
Silver Spoon - Check out our latest video  and the FB page

Re: Harrison Mixbus v5 User Review by Tommy Zai

Postby n o i s e f l e ur » Fri Dec 06, 2019 9:31 pm

Yeah . . . it might be all that and a bag of chips - but how does it compare to MuTools MuLab v8???
n o i s e f l e ur
Regular
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 6:20 am


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users