You are here

There is no double S in BUSES

For feedback and suggestions about the SOS magazine, app, web site or forums.

Re: There is no double S in BUSES

Postby Eddy Deegan » Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:04 pm

Is the singular 'bus' or 'buss'? ... iew?page=2 uses 'bus' (and 'busses') but searching for 'buss' on the website returns a lot of hits in article titles.

I feel it a little mischievous to point out and I suspect it's one of those things that folks 'know' is there but it's just too much of a faff to retrospectively standardise (plus to be honest, who cares?!) :angel:

The standard of copy in SOS is exemplary, so please don't interpret this as criticism, I was just having a little fun poking around.
User avatar
Eddy Deegan
Posts: 5113
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:00 am
Location: Brighton & Hove, UK
Some of my works
The 2nd SOS Forum Album project

Re: There is no double S in BUSES

Postby Moroccomoose » Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:19 pm

In Stoke it would be buz! And a plurality buzzes...Which in this context is entirely inappropriate!
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:00 am
Location: Staffordshire

Re: There is no double S in BUSES

Postby Folderol » Wed Jan 22, 2020 10:57 pm

Hugh Robjohns wrote:
Eddy Deegan wrote:I had to work hard finding that. The force is strong with The Korff :clap:

Oh no! Now you've done it...

(Actually, it might not have been Chris who profffed that one....)

profffed :crazy:
User avatar
Jedi Poster
Posts: 11749
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:00 am
Location: The Mudway Towns, UK
Yes. I am that Linux nut.
Onwards and... err... sideways!

Re: There is no double S in BUSES

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:23 am

:lol: yes, Chris didn't proof my post either... :bouncy:
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Posts: 29131
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound