You are here
master buss hpf rolloff
22 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
master buss hpf rolloff
I noticed in the March issue of this fine publication, Both the Greg Wells and the Mixing & Mastering modern metal article by Mark Mynett talk about hpf at 39/40hz.
My lack of experience has led me to just setting it at 20hz, But I was wondering if there is a rule of thumb on this or is it depended on the program material, Edm at a lower setting than country etc and at what slope ? or do you have a set and forget setting.
thanks all.
My lack of experience has led me to just setting it at 20hz, But I was wondering if there is a rule of thumb on this or is it depended on the program material, Edm at a lower setting than country etc and at what slope ? or do you have a set and forget setting.
thanks all.
- The Sponge
- Poster
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:12 am
- Location: New Zealand
Always Adsorbing even if I think I'm full.
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
I always tend to do it by the material. If I've got a fairly prominent double bass part then I'll set it fairly low (but fairly steep), if it's something which doesn't need it (just guitar and voice for example) then I'll run it much higher. If you're working with a sub-heavy style then you'll probably want to go lower still - as long as things are still under control.
-
blinddrew - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
- Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
For starters I wouldn't put an HPF over the master buss. The place to sort this out is on the individual channels. Clean it up at the start and you can forget about it. You can also target each source with an appropriate setting - you'd have a far higher HPF frequency on a hi-hat channel than a kick drum.
Then it's all about ears, good monitoring and a spectrum display. Don't look for rules (there are none, anyway) - work with the audio you have and react to what it tells you it needs.
Then it's all about ears, good monitoring and a spectrum display. Don't look for rules (there are none, anyway) - work with the audio you have and react to what it tells you it needs.
-
The Elf - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 11810
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Generally as The Elf says. I'd always clean each channel first in a mix. But it does depend on what FX you've got on your master buss. If you've got something that's pushing up the bass levels significantly during the mastering process (lots of compression or limiting), then it may be worth putting a high pass filter in after those FX in the chain just to keep the very low frequencies under control if they've been boosted significantly. If not, then there's no need for it.
-
Wonks - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 7537
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
The Elf wrote:For starters I wouldn't put an HPF over the master buss. The place to sort this out is on the individual channels. Clean it up at the start and you can forget about it. You can also target each source with an appropriate setting - you'd have a far higher HPF frequency on a hi-hat channel than a kick drum.
Repeated for emphasis -- this is the correct approach in my view. If you're HPF-ing the master bus it's all too little too late in my opinion!
-
Hugh Robjohns - Moderator
- Posts: 22407
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
It's probably paranoia on my part, i hpf everything individually but I'm very aware that i struggle with analysing the low end so a bit of belt and braces shouldn't do any harm, after all, there's nothing there i want to keep.
On a related note though, even after applying hpfs at source and bus stages, my master eq still shows plenty of activity at the bottom end. Am i just not being brutal enough with my slopes?
On a related note though, even after applying hpfs at source and bus stages, my master eq still shows plenty of activity at the bottom end. Am i just not being brutal enough with my slopes?
-
blinddrew - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
- Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Possibly. And remember that compressors will tend to raise the low end tails too.
Reverbs can also generate a lot of unwanted low end -- so it's often worth high-passing the input to a reverb (or sometimes the output)
Reverbs can also generate a lot of unwanted low end -- so it's often worth high-passing the input to a reverb (or sometimes the output)
-
Hugh Robjohns - Moderator
- Posts: 22407
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
I have been doing the individual channel thing as a matter of course, a hpf is the first step I take and then eq from there, So It sounds like I have been taking the right aproach for the most part. Thanks all for your replys.
- The Sponge
- Poster
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:12 am
- Location: New Zealand
Always Adsorbing even if I think I'm full.
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
I'd be a bit wary of the frequency displays shown on live EQ displays as I find they often show very low frequencies that simply aren't there, (as I know from when I've just used a very steep HPF first at a much higher frequency setting for test purposes) probably as a result of short 'moving window' time periods which cause inaccuracies in the frequency calcs. I find that if I use an offline frequency response tool in my DAW to check a section of a waveform, those low frequencies that show up on a moving display simply don't show on a static one.
-
Wonks - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 7537
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Wonks wrote:I'd be a bit wary of the frequency displays shown on live EQ displays as I find they often show very low frequencies that simply aren't there...
Very true. The spectral analysis in the EQ plugs is often configured with a very short FFT length to make it fast and responsive, but light on processing horsepower. As a direct result, the low end measurements are very inaccurate and tend to look much more evil and busy than they really are. A longer FFT will help to improve the accuracy, if that option is available.
A bargraph-style 1/3 octave 'real-time analyser' (RTA) is often a better choice of meter for assessing the low-end energy as you check individual channels and mixes, although it doesn't look as impressive!
H
-
Hugh Robjohns - Moderator
- Posts: 22407
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
I band pass every channel and still HPF the master bus. Both sounds and processes will invariably generate sub harmonics through interaction and summing. Good to filter those out too but with a gentler slope than the required aggressive slopes for channel band passing.
-
Zukan - Moderator
- Posts: 7443
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 12:00 am
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
blinddrew wrote:On a related note though, even after applying hpfs at source and bus stages, my master eq still shows plenty of activity at the bottom end. Am i just not being brutal enough with my slopes?
Good man Drew, that's been on my "Should I ask this question or not?" list for a while...
-
The Bunk - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:00 am
- Location: SW London
2 answers; 799 questions and about 58 "Mornington Crescent" posts.
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
The Bunk wrote:
Good man Drew, that's been on my "Should I ask this question or not?" list for a while...
Never be afraid to ask what might seem like daft or obvious questions in the SOS Forum. Nobody is going to call you out -- there's so much to learn and we're all on this great journey together.
-
Forum Admin - Moderator
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:00 pm
- Location: A studio deep in the fenlands of Cambridgeshire, UK
SEARCH 10,410 top articles: www.soundonsound.com/search
*NEW* SOS Video Tutorials: www.soundonsound.com/tutorials
*NEW* SOS Video Tutorials: www.soundonsound.com/tutorials
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Forum Admin wrote:The Bunk wrote:
Good man Drew, that's been on my "Should I ask this question or not?" list for a while...
Never be afraid to ask what might seem like daft or obvious questions in the SOS Forum. Nobody is going to call you out -- there's so much to learn and we're all on this great journey together.
Of course, and I can speak from experience

-
The Bunk - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:00 am
- Location: SW London
2 answers; 799 questions and about 58 "Mornington Crescent" posts.
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Zukan wrote:I band pass every channel and still HPF the master bus. Both sounds and processes will invariably generate sub harmonics through interaction and summing. Good to filter those out too but with a gentler slope than the required aggressive slopes for channel band passing.
A bit belt AND braces, but then Zukan does often work in EDM and hip hop, where low end can be both extreme and very desirable when performed correctly.
Low cutting individual channels as needed, does makes perfect sense, and rolling off top end from some sounds in these more 'creative' genres can indeed create more space in the final mix.
If you still need to HPF the master buss then at least doing it first channel by channel will require less extreme settings across the entire mix, which makes perfect sense to me.
Martin
-
Martin Walker - Moderator
- Posts: 13159
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:44 am
- Location: Cornwall, UK
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
Thanks folks, really useful responses as usual. 

-
blinddrew - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
- Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
It is usually OK to roll-off below 24-30 Hz to get rid of any potential rumble.
This can sometimes help to clean up the low-end across a mostly completed mix.
If you're finding that you need to high-pass more drastically,
it's better to go back and address the problem on the individual channel(s).
This can sometimes help to clean up the low-end across a mostly completed mix.
If you're finding that you need to high-pass more drastically,
it's better to go back and address the problem on the individual channel(s).
-
varunbkk - Poster
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:19 am
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
I cannot help but think all that design time and effort to make DC coupled gear with fancy servos is a bit of a waste?
Dave.
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 9757
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
ef37a wrote:I cannot help but think all that design time and effort to make DC coupled gear with fancy servos is a bit of a waste?
It's great for measuring earthquakes though.
-
James Perrett - Moderator
- Posts: 7763
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page
Re: master buss hpf rolloff
James Perrett wrote:ef37a wrote:I cannot help but think all that design time and effort to make DC coupled gear with fancy servos is a bit of a waste?
It's great for measuring earthquakes though.
Probably need a longer integration time than the average 'cork sniffer's' mic pre?
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 9757
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users