You are here

NT-SF1

All about the tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

Re: NT-SF1

Postby ConcertinaChap » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:14 am

Here's a review of the Zylia system as it was a couple of years ago.

https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/zylia-zm-1

I suspect the hardware's the same but the software has had a lot of development since then. Paul doesn't mention the overall quality of the sound, from which I guess we can assume it's decent as I'm sure he would mention it if it was poor.

CC
User avatar
ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8285
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.

Re: NT-SF1

Postby blinddrew » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:15 am

I thought i remembered reading about this: https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/zylia-zm-1

[Edit - Ha! Great minds and all that...]
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 9473
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Wonks » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:18 am

blinddrew wrote:Well if you will insist on tying yourself to these proprietary platforms... ;)

As opposed to Folderol who ties himself to non-proprietary platforms? :D
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10694
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:22 am

ConcertinaChap wrote:Unless I misread (always possible) it doesn't have onboard recording.

Sorry -- my bad. You're right and I was thinking of something else. It provides a USB output for recording HOA in a laptop etc, but includes the tracking/processing software platform.

PS Just noticed the DAW is required to be Reaper or Ardor. No idea why this should be and it seems a remarkably arbitrary restriction but if I can't use it with Logic then the whole concept is dead in the water and floating downstream towards the weir.

It's because of Logic's current restriction on the number of tracks which can be processed together for the higher-order ambisonic source and output tracks. Logic will probably catch up with the tech requirements eventually...

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26298
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: NT-SF1

Postby ConcertinaChap » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:42 am

OK, well Paul's review suggests the recording can be exported as a set of wav files and if that's still the case that would still make for a satisfactory (if time consuming) way of moving the data to the DAW, one that would also apply to Cubase, Pro Tools and the rest since they aren't on the list either.

CC
User avatar
ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8285
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Mike Stranks » Sat Feb 02, 2019 11:55 am

I'd be reluctant to get one of those... visiting grandkids might think it was a football....
Mike Stranks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 6960
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:00 am

Re: NT-SF1

Postby ConcertinaChap » Sat Feb 02, 2019 12:00 pm

That's a definite score for me then, no grand kids :)

CC
User avatar
ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8285
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.

Re: NT-SF1

Postby ManFromGlass » Sat Feb 02, 2019 2:46 pm

....ambisonic sound in all its glory of mic sailing through the air ....... :smirk:
User avatar
ManFromGlass
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2685
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am
Location: In the woods in Canada
 

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Wonks » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:26 pm

[1966]They think the sound's all over... well it is now![/1966]
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 10694
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: NT-SF1

Postby ConcertinaChap » Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:56 pm

For Drew especially but anyone else who's interested in the Zylia after some digging I eventually found the pages with the really interesting info here.

Zylia comes really close to what I want, but ultimately fails largely because of the channels-per-track restriction Hugh noted. There's more to it than that, however. There's two versions of the app, the basic and the pro. The basic app is standalone and is responsible for making the actual recording and afterwards can export individual tracks for each "virtual microphone" that can be loaded into a DAW like Logic. Unfortunately and rather bizarrely you have to set up the virtual mics before you start recording. This completely cuts away the whole point of ambisonic recording for me which is the post hoc ability to change your virtual mic placement. Consider the following usage, a ring of people singing or playing instruments (my particular case a group of shanty singers) with the ambisonic mic in the middle. I would want to make the recording and then depending on who is actually leading the shanty at that moment set up my virtual mics accordingly. You can't do that with the Zylia basic, you'd have to rejig the recording setup each time before you start recording.

The Zylia basic app sort of works for their suggested usage, people rehearsing in a fixed and predetermined arrangement but for any real world usage - nah. I think this restriction is only present to justify the very much more expensive Zylia pro app which can do post hoc selection of virtual mics and work as a plugin within your DAW, but only if your DAW can handle single tracks with a minimum of 19 channels. As Hugh points out Logic can't do this. I don't know about other DAWs but as I noted above they specify either Reader or Ardor only in their minimum requirements.

So there we are. Shame really.

CC
User avatar
ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8285
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.

Re: NT-SF1

Postby blinddrew » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:25 pm

Thank you very much sir, will have a shufti. :)
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 9473
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:35 pm

ConcertinaChap wrote:...the very much more expensive Zylia pro app which can do post hoc selection of virtual mics and work as a plugin within your DAW, but only if your DAW can handle single tracks with a minimum of 19 channels. As Hugh points out Logic can't do this. I don't know about other DAWs but as I noted above they specify either Reader or Ardor only in their minimum requirements.

I believe Nuendo can handle large channel-count single tracks, and I'm sure there are others, but Reaper is a very popular choice because its developers have been so responsive to the needs of HOA and have added and developed the required functionality very promptly. Logic is not the only mainstream DAW to fail to support HOA; ProTools can't do it either...

(Well, the premium hardware version can't because of the physical limitations of its internal DSP structures. The native version could be updated to support high channel-count single tracks, but Avid don't want to do that because the cheap native version would then outperform the expensive hardware flagship version... ;-) )
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26298
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Sam Inglis » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:20 pm

Hugh Robjohns wrote:(Well, the premium hardware version can't because of the physical limitations of its internal DSP structures. The native version could be updated to support high channel-count single tracks, but Avid don't want to do that because the cheap native version would then outperform the expensive hardware flagship version... ;-) )

You mean in the same way that Cubase could be updated to support high channel-count tracks but Steinberg don't want to do that because then no-one would pay the extra for Nuendo? Or the way that Samplitude could inherit all the features of Sequoia but then there wouldn't be any point in Sequoia's existence?...
Sam Inglis
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2559
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 1:00 am

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Ramirez » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:08 pm

Sam Inglis wrote:
Hugh Robjohns wrote:(Well, the premium hardware version can't because of the physical limitations of its internal DSP structures. The native version could be updated to support high channel-count single tracks, but Avid don't want to do that because the cheap native version would then outperform the expensive hardware flagship version... ;-) )

You mean in the same way that Cubase could be updated to support high channel-count tracks but Steinberg don't want to do that because then no-one would pay the extra for Nuendo? Or the way that Samplitude could inherit all the features of Sequoia but then there wouldn't be any point in Sequoia's existence?...

Not quite, because the premium version of PT can’t do it!
Ramirez
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 am
Location: Bethesda, Cymru
Bill Withers while Tom Waits, and Stan Getz

Re: NT-SF1

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Sat Feb 02, 2019 8:21 pm

Ramirez wrote:Not quite, because the premium version of PT can’t do it!

Precisiment! ;-)
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26298
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

PreviousNext