You are here

Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:56 pm

Have I successfully scared everyone into stupefaction?! :lol:
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby blinddrew » Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:24 pm

We're cogitating...

Or waiting until we're at a screen where we can zoom in enough on the screen shots to see what's actually going on! :)
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:15 pm

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:20 pm

As clear as Brexit so far.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:29 pm

Possibly because you've posted two pictures of a low pass filter, when you wanted one low pass, one band pass and one high-pass filter.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:37 pm

And without being able to see where the outputs of the channels are being sent to (I can see where aux sends are going) it's impossible to work out the full routing path.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:37 pm

Wonks wrote:Possibly because you've posted two pictures of a low pass filter, when you wanted one low pass, one band pass and one high-pass filter.
Nope - it's correct as shown. It's all about polarity and routing. Take another look!
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:38 pm

Wonks wrote:And without being able to see where the outputs of the channels are being sent to (I can see where aux sends are going) it's impossible to work out the full routing path.
It's all there - top of the channels.
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:41 pm

No, not getting it. And the second photo shows the audio has already come from a high pass filter, so it is effectively a band-pass filter for the mids.

I know you know what you're doing, but it's not as easy to let us know what you are doing.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:41 pm

The Elf wrote:
Wonks wrote:And without being able to see where the outputs of the channels are being sent to (I can see where aux sends are going) it's impossible to work out the full routing path.
It's all there - top of the channels.

:thumbup: missed that - all rather small.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:59 pm

OK...

What is happening is this:

The original audio is split, using sends, to three 'Mult' channels, each containing a filter. The original channel has no output destination (though it could be routed to its inversion channel, I suppose - more on that later).

'Mult Lo' gets a LPF that limits it to frequencies below 200Hz.
'Mult Md' gets a LPF that limits it to frequencies below 2kHz.
'Mult Hi' gets a instance of the same filter, but I don't switch on any processing in there - it's simply to ensure that any oddities of the plug-in (delays, distortions, etc) are present in each band. Strictly speaking it needn't be there.

'Mult Lo' is sent to a channel where it is inverted in polarity and this inverted version sent to 'Mult Md' and 'Mult Hi'. This cleanly removes anything below that set 200Hz frequency from both the 'Mult Hi' and Mult Md' channels.

'Mult Md' is sent to a channel where it is inverted in polarity and this inverted version sent to 'Mult Hi'. This cleanly removes anything below that set 2kHz frequency from the 'Mult Hi' channel.

(The inverted channels are not routed to an output, as I only need them for their sends).

Essentially the splitting job is now done. I now route the three 'Mult' channels to corresponding 'Process' channels, where I can do whatever I want to each band - trim, compress, expand... anything.

The last channel on the right is simply an inverted version of the original source. Un-muting this should give an absolute null at the stereo output - proving that no artefacts are being created by the splitting process - and it does do just that.

The whole point of this is to avoid using LPF, Band and HPF filters, since these create anomalies at their cross-overs. My method nulls all such anomalies.

Hope that begins to make sense! :)
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby blinddrew » Fri Mar 22, 2019 4:06 pm

Aha, it all makes sense now. :)
User avatar
blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Fri Mar 22, 2019 4:53 pm

I've done a block diagram which might be helpful to reveal what's going on:

three band filter structure.png
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 23705
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Watchmaker » Fri Mar 22, 2019 4:54 pm

I obviously need to quit my day job.
User avatar
Watchmaker
Frequent Poster
Posts: 512
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:00 am
Location: Upstate NY, USA
Take my advice, I'm not using it.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:16 pm

Hugh Robjohns wrote:I've done a block diagram which might be helpful to reveal what's going on...
...which proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Hugh is far cleverer than me! :lol:

Nicely summed up! :thumbup: :clap:
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:20 pm

:blush: It's only a diagram! I think seeing the signal flow is often easier to understand than the words...

The hard part was trying to work out what was going on from your Cubase screen-grab. I should have waited until you'd written your description! :D

This idea of subtractive filtering is actually used more commonly than it might seem, and does have useful benefits when it comes to seamless integration through the cross-over regions, as you have explained.

H
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 23705
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:16 pm

OK, Ive worked out what's going on but:

The Elf wrote:The whole point of this is to avoid using LPF, Band and HPF filters, since these create anomalies at their cross-overs. My method nulls all such anomalies.

This system uses two LPFs. These will still impart their 'artefacts' to the resulting audio signals around the crossover point.

With no extra processing, the artefacts from the LPF cancel out because of the various inversions and recombinations once the three signals are re-combined. But they are still there within in the three process mults. It's only when recombined without further processing that everything cancels out.

But any signal boosting or cutting that affects the 200Hz and 2000Hz areas on one of the mult tracks will not allow full cancellation, so those artefacts then come through; albeit at the level of the boost/cut. So any level alteration would let some artefacts through that could cause slight interaction with the mult above or below once the three mults are recombined.

So with processing on the mults, then filter interaction caused by the band splitting is then significantly minimised (rather than completely eradicated), and it only occurs at two points in the audio spectrum (rather than at the four points that would exist if a LP filter, BP filter and HP filter were used instead to create the mults).

And relax.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:27 pm

Any artefacts will have *some* effect as soon as you move away from the unity/zero processing position, but better that than have the audio compromised before you've even moved a control. I'd argue that this is better!
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby Wonks » Fri Mar 22, 2019 7:30 pm

I didn't say it wasn't! I was just trying to get a fuller understanding of how it worked.
User avatar
Wonks
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8669
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853

Re: Giving vocals a consistent volume through the mix

Postby The Elf » Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:40 pm

There's no reason why this technique can't be expanded into more frequency bands. You can use whatever filters that take your fancy, change slopes, crossover frequencies, etc. You effectively have your own completely customisable multi-band processor.

Another advantage I hadn't considered until now is that by un-muting the 'Inverted Original' channel you get a hint at what your processing is doing, since anything you hear is the difference between the original audio and your processing.

When I use this for 'mastering' I hide all of the mult and inversion channels to allow me to concentrate on the important stuff.

I've found polarity tricks quite useful in many situations. Recently I used some keyboard parts in opposite polarity to remove the same parts from a mix file where the original tracks without keyboard were not available.

Just realising that this hijack should probably have its own thread! Admins, feel free...
User avatar
The Elf
Jedi Poster
Posts: 12353
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.

PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users