You are here
Recording Help!
49 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Recording Help!
Or you could simply test all the mics, one at a time, into the same mic channel on the mixer.
-
Wonks - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10143
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Reading, UK
Correcting mistakes on the internet since 1853
Re: Recording Help!
Wonks wrote:Or you could simply test all the mics, one at a time, into the same mic channel on the mixer.
Many ways to case this moggy Wonks but I think there is an opinion that the Berry mixer cannot supply full phantom power to all six mics? (OP's post is not clear on that though)
I have my doubts since I think the mics draw very little current (will check mine shortly) and I have never read of these mixers having such a problem and they have sold SO many we surely would have! People LOVE
Behrry bashing.
Spook volts inside the mic read 32.8 per pin so the current draw is 2.2mA per leg, 4.4mA overall. That is more than many capacitor mics but I would think well within the capabilities of the X1222?
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10874
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Re: Recording Help!
Forget phantom power. It's limited by it's tech concept, not by brand.
Test the mics. I've bought a few of these Neewer BM800's (to use as a housing for DIY mic projects. Some early ones were too good to use as simply a housing. Some later ones were junk and perfect for the job...
Test the mics. I've bought a few of these Neewer BM800's (to use as a housing for DIY mic projects. Some early ones were too good to use as simply a housing. Some later ones were junk and perfect for the job...
- cyrano.mac
- Regular
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:00 pm
Re: Recording Help!
Morning folks,
Once again, thank you all so much for your input. I’m an absolute novice when getting this techie on sound production and your advice has proven invaluable so far.
So, here’s the latest update. I have tested all of the mics, one at a time per channel and they are each fine however when you plug them all in at the same time, this is where the problems start.
My personal opinion is that each mic requires phantom power as they’re condenser mics and the more mics you use at one time, the more the power is split (I know I’m staying the obvious here!). I’m not sure the mixer has enough “juice” to provide adequate power to all six mics in one go and therefore it prioritises some channels over others which creates the unbalanced sounds.
I think in this particular instance, channels 4 and 5 are the worse performing ones (which Sam Spoons has mentioned, has less dB than channels 1-4):
As I stated earlier, this then means that to be heard on those two channels, I have to whack the gain up to pretty much max to be create the same recording level as mics 1-4 but that means lots of “white noise” being heard.
I think my only, and probably easiest, option is to take the phantom power out of the equation and just use dynamic mics. Given we’re six friends who create a podcast, I want a good, clean sound but I don’t think we’ll be giving our day jobs up anytime soon! :lol:
If you have experience of using dynamics and can recommend one at a good price, do let me know.
Thanks again,
G
Once again, thank you all so much for your input. I’m an absolute novice when getting this techie on sound production and your advice has proven invaluable so far.
So, here’s the latest update. I have tested all of the mics, one at a time per channel and they are each fine however when you plug them all in at the same time, this is where the problems start.
My personal opinion is that each mic requires phantom power as they’re condenser mics and the more mics you use at one time, the more the power is split (I know I’m staying the obvious here!). I’m not sure the mixer has enough “juice” to provide adequate power to all six mics in one go and therefore it prioritises some channels over others which creates the unbalanced sounds.
I think in this particular instance, channels 4 and 5 are the worse performing ones (which Sam Spoons has mentioned, has less dB than channels 1-4):
Sam Spoons wrote:The manual says all 6 mic inputs have spook but 1-4 have compressors and +60dB gain while 5&6 have no comp and +40dB.
As I stated earlier, this then means that to be heard on those two channels, I have to whack the gain up to pretty much max to be create the same recording level as mics 1-4 but that means lots of “white noise” being heard.
I think my only, and probably easiest, option is to take the phantom power out of the equation and just use dynamic mics. Given we’re six friends who create a podcast, I want a good, clean sound but I don’t think we’ll be giving our day jobs up anytime soon! :lol:
If you have experience of using dynamics and can recommend one at a good price, do let me know.
Thanks again,
G
- G18ALG
- Poster
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:28 pm
Re: Recording Help!
Looks like Behringer bashing is still justified with some of their gear.
Do you really need six mic's?...
Do you really need six mic's?...
-
The Elf - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 13053
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Recording Help!
See my earlier post about the Rode M3.
Capacitor (Condenser) mic quality, but can be battery-powered. Punches above its weight.
The problem with many dynamic mics into that mixer is that you'll be struggling with gain on spoken voice. They're designed for on-stage singers, not conversation. (Been there, done that...!)
Or... you could write it all off to experience and start again with the RodecasterPro. Not sure if it'll give you six mics though...
Capacitor (Condenser) mic quality, but can be battery-powered. Punches above its weight.
The problem with many dynamic mics into that mixer is that you'll be struggling with gain on spoken voice. They're designed for on-stage singers, not conversation. (Been there, done that...!)
Or... you could write it all off to experience and start again with the RodecasterPro. Not sure if it'll give you six mics though...
- Mike Stranks
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:00 am
Re: Recording Help!
The Elf wrote:Looks like Behringer bashing is still justified with some of their gear.
Do you really need six mic's?...
Ideally yes because some of the guys are softer spoken than others so sharing a mic wouldn’t really work.
- G18ALG
- Poster
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:28 pm
Re: Recording Help!
Mike Stranks wrote:See my earlier post about the Rode M3.
Capacitor (Condenser) mic quality, but can be battery-powered. Punches above its weight.
The problem with many dynamic mics into that mixer is that you'll be struggling with gain on spoken voice. They're designed for on-stage singers, not conversation. (Been there, done that...!)
Or... you could write it all off to experience and start again with the RodecasterPro. Not sure if it'll give you six mics though...
When you say:
“The problem with many dynamic mics into that mixer is that you'll be struggling with gain on spoken voice. They're designed for on-stage singers, not conversation”
Do you mean we’d have to really shout/project our voices to be heard?
- G18ALG
- Poster
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:28 pm
Re: Recording Help!
G18ALG wrote:
When you say:
“The problem with many dynamic mics into that mixer is that you'll be struggling with gain on spoken voice. They're designed for on-stage singers, not conversation”
Do you mean we’d have to really shout/project our voices to be heard?
Well that's the gist of it! :)
What usually happens with mixers in this class - and there are very many with similiar preamp specs ; it's not a Behringer thing - is that to get decent level on conversational discussion and comment when using dynamic mics you have to crank the gain quite high. And then you run the risk of introducing preamp noise into the situation.
I really wouldn't recommend cheaper or stage dynamic mics into that mixer if you have some quiet voices that you need to record.
A couple of years ago I advised a community radio station that was having similar issues with semi-decent stage mics into a Yamaha mixer of similar spec to yours. They upgraded to Rode M3s (but not six!) and did a few other tweaks and it was smiles all round.
Oh; and where are you based? If not too far from me in Cirencester I'd be happy to meet and have a chat...
Mike
- Mike Stranks
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:00 am
Re: Recording Help!
My experience with Behringer pre amps is limited to the Xenyx 802 and those in the brilliant concept but poorly implememented BCA2000 but both were very good.
It is also my experience with two interfaces, the 8i6 and my KA6 that yes, you need the gain at max to get a f'picked acoustic guitar to say -20dBfs but even in leafy, Npton suburbia at 2am, external noise dominates the electronic noise. The best I can get is around -70dBfs whereas the circuit noise (from the KA6 say) is around -80dB fs.
I also have an A&H ZED10 and that has I would guess the best pre amps for noise/gain but the improvement over the X802 is in fact marginal at best. Certainly will have higher headroom.
In other words, unless OP has a particularly bad sample, that mixer should be usable with dynamics in a normal room in the daytime/early evening. I agree, capacitors should make life easier but noises off can be even more of a problem.
OP may gather from all this that this audio lark is FAR from simple!
In the past I have had a Fast track Pro and a Tascam US 122. Both WERE noisy buggers!
Dave.
It is also my experience with two interfaces, the 8i6 and my KA6 that yes, you need the gain at max to get a f'picked acoustic guitar to say -20dBfs but even in leafy, Npton suburbia at 2am, external noise dominates the electronic noise. The best I can get is around -70dBfs whereas the circuit noise (from the KA6 say) is around -80dB fs.
I also have an A&H ZED10 and that has I would guess the best pre amps for noise/gain but the improvement over the X802 is in fact marginal at best. Certainly will have higher headroom.
In other words, unless OP has a particularly bad sample, that mixer should be usable with dynamics in a normal room in the daytime/early evening. I agree, capacitors should make life easier but noises off can be even more of a problem.
OP may gather from all this that this audio lark is FAR from simple!
In the past I have had a Fast track Pro and a Tascam US 122. Both WERE noisy buggers!
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10874
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Re: Recording Help!
I don't know the purpose of your podcast, beyond that it's a hobby for you all, but I assume you want to become better at it so some attention to voice delivery would be a benefit, get the quietly spoken members of the team to learn to project a little more and experiment with distance from the mics (halving the distance increases the level by 4x relative to preamp noise). If you can get past the tech issues it will become a more enjoyable experience for you all. Good luck.
-
Sam Spoons - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........
Re: Recording Help!
ef37a wrote:
In other words, unless OP has a particularly bad sample, that mixer should be usable with dynamics in a normal room in the daytime/early evening.
But they're not Dave! I've used an 802 for conversational spoken word in a very quiet treated room and needed a front-end preamp to avoid hiss-city. And the mixer was connected to a pro-quality digital recorder.
And picking up on Sam's point... unless you have cardioid mics designed for close-working - dynamic or otherwise - then you get proximity effect. For natural-sounding conversational voice you have to back off the mic somewhat. As a radio presenter I habitually worked the mic at about 0.5 - 1.0 inches. I quickly found for more conversational work I had to back-off to achieve a more natural sound. I do agree that some form of voice coaching may be necessary, but people need to be able to concentrate on content and not technique.
- Mike Stranks
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:00 am
Re: Recording Help!
Ok Mike, I will give you that if they are not on top of the mic and of feeble voice they need better pre amps!
But! OP had better have a pretty quiet place. As has been said before in this forum, "gain is gain". Does not matter whether you get it from a sensitive capacitor capsule or a Cloudlifter boosted dynamic, external noise will get in and the only way to beat it is to get closer and reduce gain.
Dave.
But! OP had better have a pretty quiet place. As has been said before in this forum, "gain is gain". Does not matter whether you get it from a sensitive capacitor capsule or a Cloudlifter boosted dynamic, external noise will get in and the only way to beat it is to get closer and reduce gain.
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10874
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Re: Recording Help!
It MIGHT be worth considering just using one omni mic?
6 people round a single table, with the louder voices a bit further away than the quieter voices.
It will sound a bit open, but I suspect having 6 mics all faded up at the same time will sound fairly open too?
6 people round a single table, with the louder voices a bit further away than the quieter voices.
It will sound a bit open, but I suspect having 6 mics all faded up at the same time will sound fairly open too?
-
Kwackman - Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Belfast
Cubase, guitars.
Re: Recording Help!
My small experience of amateur talking heads is that they expect to be heard with the mic on a table stand at arms length * in front of them so reducing that distance to 12" or even 6" will have considerable benefits while still minimising the problems of proximity effect. As has been said, the closer the better from a signal to noise (from whatever source) POV.
* the biggest involved 21 boxers, promoters and pundits at a press conference, we did have to resort to all manner of vocal mics simply to make up the numbers, IIRC Beta 57/58s were the most effective. Horrible gigs, I'm very glad to be out of all that now.
* the biggest involved 21 boxers, promoters and pundits at a press conference, we did have to resort to all manner of vocal mics simply to make up the numbers, IIRC Beta 57/58s were the most effective. Horrible gigs, I'm very glad to be out of all that now.
-
Sam Spoons - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........
Re: Recording Help!
+1 Maybe one for the the louder speakers and one for the quieter ones - choose your end of the table!Kwackman wrote:It MIGHT be worth considering just using one omni mic?
6 people round a single table, with the louder voices a bit further away than the quieter voices.
-
The Elf - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 13053
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Sheffield, UK
An Eagle for an Emperor, A Kestrel for a Knave.
Re: Recording Help!
" Horrible gigs, I'm very glad to be out of all that now."
Heh! We set out 4 mics in banquet stands for the principles at an AGM.
MD was fine seated (we were told they all would sit) but then the ******treasurer STOOD UP and he was eight feet tall! To add injury to it he had the voice of a four foot two inch girl.
Sometimes yer just can't win.
Dave.
Heh! We set out 4 mics in banquet stands for the principles at an AGM.
MD was fine seated (we were told they all would sit) but then the ******treasurer STOOD UP and he was eight feet tall! To add injury to it he had the voice of a four foot two inch girl.
Sometimes yer just can't win.
Dave.
- ef37a
- Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10874
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: northampton uk
Re: Recording Help!
And why to the quiet speakers sit back in their chair and the loud one insist in pulling the mic closer :madas: :madas: :madas:
-
Sam Spoons - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 10554
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........
Re: Recording Help!
So I’ve been in touch with the shop that sold me the mixer to say “that thing you sold me doesn’t have enough power for all six mics like you said it would” and they have replied with “Given your description it sounds to me like you have diagnosed this correctly. To ensure that there is enough power to go around we usually recommend using a USB audio interface, something like the 18i20 that has a power supply (as opposed to bus power).”
If only they’d have told me that before!!
P.s. For those that have asked, it is a hobby podcast (six friends chewing the fat on random topics every week) but the lack of sound quality really lets it down at the moment. Feel free to check it out on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube etc. It’s called ‘Don’t Touch The Bugles’. There’s quite a few F Bombs though so be warned!
If only they’d have told me that before!!
P.s. For those that have asked, it is a hobby podcast (six friends chewing the fat on random topics every week) but the lack of sound quality really lets it down at the moment. Feel free to check it out on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube etc. It’s called ‘Don’t Touch The Bugles’. There’s quite a few F Bombs though so be warned!
- G18ALG
- Poster
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2019 3:28 pm
Re: Recording Help!
Perhaps you could replace just a couple of mics with dynamics and give those to the loudmouths :)
That might leave enough power for the condensers.
CC
That might leave enough power for the condensers.
CC
-
ConcertinaChap - Jedi Poster
- Posts: 7747
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio.
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Dan LB