# SPDIF cable

All about the tools and techniques involved in capturing sound, in the studio or on location.

### Re: SPDIF cable

blinddrew wrote:Right.
Maybe. ;)
I shall read that again a couple of times. :)

Just make sure that you use 75 ohm 'digital' cables for S/PDIF, rather than an audio phono to phono cable, to avoid any dropouts/glitches/twilight zone weirdness ;)

Martin

Martin Walker
Moderator
Posts: 15130
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Cornwall, UK

### Re: SPDIF cable

blinddrew wrote:Right.
Maybe. ;)
I shall read that again a couple of times. :)

:D Try reading this explanation.

https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/ ... impedance/

Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26283
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

### Re: SPDIF cable

"calculated vectorially"
Gaahk - math alert! :shocked:
Although there were some bits I could understand and it is interesting stuff.
Do they actually do measurements when cable temperature is reduced to absolute zero for a baseline, or is that a modeled scenario?

ManFromGlass
Frequent Poster (Level2)
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:00 am
Location: In the woods in Canada

### Re: SPDIF cable

ManFromGlass wrote:Do they actually do measurements when cable temperature is reduced to absolute zero for a baseline, or is that a modeled scenario?

No, it was just a thought experiment in order conveniently to remove the cable's inherent resistance so as to simplify the rest of the explanation about the charging of the cable's capacitance and energising the inductance...

Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26283
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

### Re: SPDIF cable

Do they actually do measurements when cable temperature is reduced to absolute zero for a baseline, or is that a modeled scenario?
In theory there should be no resistance, not sure about impedance, at that temperature but apparently it’s thought that there would still be some movement of atoms, when in theory there shouldn’t be.
MOF
Frequent Poster
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 1:00 am
Location: United Kingdom

### Re: SPDIF cable

Somewhat amazingly I actually sort of understood that. Enough to answer what would have been my next question.
Thanks :)

blinddrew
Jedi Poster
Posts: 9455
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:00 am
Location: York
Ignore the post count, I have no idea what I'm doing...

### Re: SPDIF cable

:thumbup:

In practical terms, if the signal frequency is high enough (like digital audio, video, rf etc), or with a lower frequency signal if the cable is long enough (like a telephone cable between cities), the cable itself behaves as a 'transmission line', and we become concerned with the transfer of power from one end to the other.

In that situation, some strange things happen. Most notably for us, if the end of the cable isn't correctly terminated, it acts like a mirror and the signal is reflected back towards the source which can cause all manner of problems depending on the circumstances. So, it is vital that the line is terminated with a resistance which is equal to the cable's characteristic impedance, and the output impedance of the source must also match the characteristic impedance... And that's why we have the notion of 'matched impedance' interfaces for high-frequency systems today.

The old 600 Ohm thing you see with a lot of vintage gear (and modern emulations) stems from the way the old telephone systems employed a 600 Ohm matched impedance format, and early pro audio gear technology was developed from the world of telephony!

But for normal audio frequencies, the cables we use -- even really long studio cables -- are far too short to behave as transmission lines, and it just makes no sense to maintain matched impedance interfaces. Hence the adoption of voltage-matched interfaces in the 70s, where the source (output) impedance is kept as low as possible, and the input impedance is kept as high as practicable -- usually with a ratio between them of 1:5 or 1:10, or something of that sort of order.

Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26283
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

### Re: SPDIF cable

Hugh Robjohns wrote:So for standard video coax cable that's around 75 Ohms, RF coax will be 50 or 75 Ohms. Mic cable, AES3, and cat5/6 cables are around 100-110 Ohms, and overhead telephone cables are around 600 Ohms.

I'll add one other to that list because I had lot of the stuff kicking around at one time. Ethernet cable (the old coax stuff that predates twisted pair) is also 50 Ohms. The connectors and T joints are identical to Wordclock ones but the terminators are also 50 Ohms rather than 75 Ohms as required by Wordclock.

CC

ConcertinaChap
Jedi Poster
Posts: 8276
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Bradford on Avon
Making music: Eagle Alley, recording music: Mr Punch's Studio
If you want me I'll be down on Sound on Sound on Sound.

### Re: SPDIF cable

ConcertinaChap wrote:Ethernet cable (the old coax stuff that predates twisted pair) is also 50 Ohms. The connectors and T joints are identical to Wordclock ones but the terminators are also 50 Ohms rather than 75 Ohms as required by Wordclock.

While the connectors may mate together, they are different and it isn't advisable to mix them.

(Picture borrowed from Wikipedia)

James Perrett
Moderator
Posts: 8877
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:00 am
Location: The wilds of Hampshire
JRP Music - Audio Mastering and Restoration. JRP Music Facebook Page

### Re: SPDIF cable

So how much would 50Ω coax degrade the transmission of word clock or SP/DIF data compared to the correct 75Ω Would 50Ω be better than audio coax?

Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 11521
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........

### Re: SPDIF cable

As most cable lengths in typical studio applications are relatively short, it tends to be incorrect terminations that cause most problems through reflected signals, rather than losses in the cable itself. And, being digital, signal distortion due to incorrect cable impedance is not as great a problem as it would be for an analogue signal...

But since 75 Ohm cable is readily available and cheap, why would you not use the right stuff?

Hugh Robjohns
Moderator
Posts: 26283
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound

### Re: SPDIF cable

Only because I have a load of 'thin ethernet' cable, connectors and terminators knocking about and it seems a waste to just bin it.

Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 11521
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........

### Re: SPDIF cable

Sam Spoons wrote:Only because I have a load of 'thin ethernet' cable, connectors and terminators knocking about and it seems a waste to just bin it.

I have a computer with a thin transceiver and I need a TX one if I want to try to get it working again. Asked a few people but even those are so old people have thrown them all out. Don't really want to buy one.

As for not correctly terminating, I once had systems just not work at particular locations on a thin ethernet network. Eventually someone turned up with a TDR to find extra termination that was causing reflections.
wireman
Regular
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:00 am

### Re: SPDIF cable

Not sure I understand #wireman, what do you mean by TX and transceiver in this context?

Sam Spoons
Jedi Poster
Posts: 11521
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Manchester UK
Finally taking this recording lark seriously (and recording my Gypsy Jazz CD)........

### Re: SPDIF cable

Sam Spoons wrote:Not sure I understand #wireman, what do you mean by TX and transceiver in this context?

I meant 10-baseT, AUI Ethernet transceiver. Been a while since I used those terms...
wireman
Regular
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:00 am

PreviousNext