You are here

SSL Nucleus 2

For everything after the recording stage: hardware/software and how you use it.

Re: SSL Nucleus 2

Postby Matt Houghton » Thu May 17, 2018 8:18 pm

Hugh Robjohns wrote:How many people need to pan every channel in real time? Surely panning is one of those set and forget things -- easily done with virtual or assignable controls.

Well, really we rarely need to do *anything* like this in real time any more, unless working live, faders included. That said, yes, I can think of stuff I've worked on where I used panning automation a lot.

But that's not really what I had in mind...  I tend not to use the default modes with most control surfaces (in my experience, they rarely make the most of its potential!), but to configure them to do the things I find most useful when mixing, using my DAW's Generic Remote editor. Things like send levels, pans, pre-inserts gain, HPF, compressor thresholds... Assuming the faders are touch sensitive, all these things can become available on any channel once you touch that channel's fader. All on one control surface.

So to me it's a simple equation: more encoders > fewer encoders. In other words, a control-surface system with eight (or 16 or 24...) continuous rotary encoders in addition to the same number of faders means far more things can be instantly controllable than when using a system with only one! :thumbup:
Matt Houghton
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:00 am
SOS Reviews Editor

Re: SSL Nucleus 2

Postby Hugh Robjohns » Thu May 17, 2018 8:22 pm

Good point well made! :D
User avatar
Hugh Robjohns
Posts: 27008
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Technical Editor, Sound On Sound