Sony's MDR range of closed‑back cans has been popular in studios for years, and now includes a new flagship model.
When choosing headphones for mixing and mastering, most people opt for an open‑backed model, as these tend to offer a more natural sound than closed‑back designs. The latter tend sonically towards a slight 'boxiness', but they offer the potential advantages of good isolation from external sounds and lower levels of leakage — qualities that make closed‑back models popular choices for recording artists and recording engineers working on location. In a domestic studio, of course, many people also require a closed‑back model, whether to block out ambient noise when mixing, or simply to keep their cohabitants sane!
So what makes a good closed‑back model for mixing? As well as good isolation and low levels of leakage, what I'm really looking for is a good, fast response across all frequencies, and excellent separation between the different elements in the mix. I can live with a slightly coloured frequency response, as that's something your ears become accustomed to after listening to a range of familiar material, though I prefer a relatively even response. If it's a model that I want to use for general listening as well — and I'd advocate that as a good way of getting your ears used to the sound — then I'll look for a model with a low impedance, so that it can be driven by an iPod or similar consumer device. They also need to be comfortable enough to wear them for long periods: that means that your ears need to be able to 'breathe' and the headphones need to stay on your head as you move, and that they must do so without pinching.
Sony's MDR 7509s have proved a popular choice. They score highly on isolation and leakage, though personally, I've always found them to be a little over‑dominant in, and slightly too 'smoothing' of, the bass end, almost to the point of sluggishness. They seem to me to work well on acoustic or low‑key, laid‑back styles, but they do tend to flatter some mixes, hiding a few problems when working on busy, loud rock music. Sony continue to offer the 7509 but have launched two new models in the range, the less expensive MDR 7510, and the pricier MDR 7520, which is reviewed here.
Sony say the 7520 is a completely new model, but I expected it to at least be similar to the MDR 7509, perhaps sharing a 'family' sound, but with a few subtle improvements. I couldn't have been more wrong! Instead, its DNA seems to be shared with a high‑end hi‑fi model, the MDR Z1000. That's not a model I'm familiar with, but the two certainly look very similar, and the published specifications are almost identical. It may be that they're slightly differently voiced with frequency-response tweaks, I suppose, but the only major differences appear to be cosmetic — there's a different finish (I prefer that of the 7520), and the 7520 has a coiled cord, whereas the Z1000 offers both coiled and straight options. The Z1000 is also more expensive! Not having had my hands on the Z1000s, I'll focus solely on the 7520s.
The 7520's design includes a new 50mm 'high‑definition' driver unit, and Sony say that a liquid‑crystal polymer film helps this reproduce frequencies in an astonishingly wide band — from 5Hz to 80kHz — though unfortunately they don't qualify that with any figures such as ±3dB points, or frequency response plots. The impedance is quoted as 24Ω, which means they'll work with most consumer, as well as professional, gear. The housing is made of a lightweight magnesium alloy, and the urethane earpads are designed to keep noise out and in, as well as to fit comfortably.
I played a range of reference material on the 7520s over the course of a week or two, and when I felt I'd become sufficiently familiar with them, I set about mixing a track, using the 7520s via a Dangerous D-Box headphone amp as my main monitoring system, and occasionally checking back on my usual nearfields and (via the same headphone amp) my Sennheiser HD650 open-backed headphones. Later, I compared the sound of a few tracks played over the 7520s, the 7509s and the Shure SRH940s, which also happened to be in for review at the time.
The first thing to say is that the fit of the 7520s (on my head, at least) is good: they're nice and snug, there's no pinching, and they fit nicely over the ears rather than pressing on them: very comfortable. The isolation and leakage performance was also decent, but they never felt suffocating, so they've hit my criteria bang on.
On to the sonics, then. Despite sounding very different from my HD650s, the 7520s ticked a lot of my mixing boxes immediately. Not only was I greeted with excellent separation of different elements in a mix (it was easy to hear into reverb tails, to pick out individual elements in a wall of distorted guitars, and to EQ vocals to taste), but the response seemed fast and tight, right across the frequency spectrum. I was able to hear both detailed hi‑hat work and what was going on at the bass end very clearly. You're never going to get that thump of real bass on headphones, as you feel that in your chest as much as hear it with your ears, but the MDR 7520s did as well as I could hope for in a headphone of this type. The only down side is that the level of detail can become a little overwhelming, which is why I rarely like to mix exclusively on good headphones. Counter-intuitively, I find that I sometimes need to be able to ignore little details! Importantly, mix decisions translated pretty well on to other systems, including those about the bass end.
I have few points of criticism. One is that like all closed-back, over-ear headphones, the MDR 7520s impart a certain amount of boxiness to the sound. This was always noticeable, but not offputting, and it never really compromised my decision‑making. Also, these are pricier than most of the competition — but I think they're also rather better, and the price is nothing compared with nearfield monitors of similar quality. I'd much rather rely on these than on cheap nearfields any day! Highly recommended. .
2.1 Monitor System
This interesting monitor system uses the natural roll-off of the satellite speakers to provide the crossover with the subwoofer.
Studio Nearfield Reference Monitors
Building to a price inevitably entails compromises. The art is in choosing the right ones...
Three-way Active Monitors
Sometimes, a dose of old-fashioned good engineering delivers something well worth listening to...
Active Two-way Studio Monitors
Their A7 nearfield monitors received many plaudits, not least in the pages of SOS, but manufacturer Adam thought there was room for improvement.
Active Nearfield Monitors
PMC broke new ground a decade ago with their TB2 monitors, but the competition have been catching up. Does PMCs new activated design nudge them back to the front of the pack?
Secondary Reference Monitors
Avantone have added on-board amplification to their contemporary take on the classic Horrortone secondary monitor, and the result is something quite special...
Two-way Nearfield Active Monitors
India may be a growing force in most industries these days, but few Indian pro-audio companies have made it into Western markets. Can Sonodynes speakers change all that?
The time-domain response of monitors is often sacrificed for level, but this sealed-cabinet design tackles that issue head-on...
Nearfield Monitor Speakers
With digital and analogue inputs, these small speakers from newcomers Infrasonic promise a lot for the money. Can they outperform their budget price tag?
2.1 Monitoring System
If you demand brutal and revealing precision from your monitors, read on...
Active Three-way Monitors
As well as a distinctive design, these huge nearfield monitors offer a frequency and time-domain performance that compares with the best.
Studio Reference Monitors
Adam make the leap to a three-way speaker design that seems to pay dividends in clarity and separation.
JBL have a reputation for clinically precise monitors, but this time theyve come up with something a little smoother...
Coaxially-mounted speakers may seem a bit old-school, but theres nothing wrong with the theory — and a touch of DSP can make them very modern indeed!
DSP Reference Monitors
Built-in DSP extends the flexibility and usefulness of these capable speakers.
Events new owners make some extravagant claims for these new high-end monitors, whose design is said to put quality first. Do they live up to the hype?
Studio Monitors & Subwoofer
Samsons new low-cost nearfields can produce a big sound, but do they measure up for serious mixing? We find out.
Ribbon tweeters can yield a smooth sound, while still capably reproducing transient detail — and the Pro Ribbon range promises to do so for an attractive price.
Active Nearfield Monitors
Focal control everything from design to manufacture in their factory in France — and this approach appears to be paying off.
Active Midfield Monitors
Getting the balance right between the benefits and disadvantages of ported and non-ported speaker designs is a tricky job, and K+H do it better than most with this ported model.