Q: Is there a difference between native and platform-based plug-ins?

Published in SOS April 2008
Bookmark and Share
I've noticed a price disparity between the Native and Powercore plug-in offerings from Sonnox. Native versions (Audio Units in my case) are much cheaper than the Powercore versions, but do they differ in quality? If so, are these differences typical of the plug-in market at large? I don't use Pro Tools but have noticed similar price differences between RTAS and TDM plug-ins. Are customers here paying for the privilege of offloading processor burdens to DSP cards, or are the plug-ins better somehow? Is there, perhaps, different algorithmic encoding involved)? I've been running native plug-ins for a while with this on my mind, and I'm hoping you might clear it up for me.
Will Wright
Features Editor Sam Inglis replies: There are several reasons why manufacturers often charge a premium for the versions of their plug-ins that run on DSP platforms such as Powercore or Pro Tools HD. Occasionally, those versions have extra functionality or superior sound quality compared with the native versions, but this is increasingly rare. However, even when the functionality of native and DSP versions is identical, there is a considerable amount of extra work involved in creating the DSP version.
TC Electronic's Powercore (left) and the Digidesign HD system (right) both use fixed-point processing to run plug-in algorithms, whereas so-called 'native' plug-in platforms, such as Audio Units, VST and RTAS, operate using floating-point mathematics. Plug-ins written for native systems therefore have to be re-coded to be able to operate on specific platforms.
TC Electronic's Powercore (left) and the Digidesign HD system (right) both use fixed-point processing to run plug-in algorithms, whereas so-called 'native' plug-in platforms, such as Audio Units, VST and RTAS, operate using floating-point mathematics. Plug-ins written for native systems therefore have to be re-coded to be able to operate on specific platforms.
With a native plug-in, the core code (usually in C++) can be re-used across different plug-in formats and even ported from Mac to PC without having to be radically rewritten. Coding for hardware DSP platforms, by contrast, is completely different, and requires that the "same" plug-in be rewritten from a very low level. For instance, native plug-in formats all use floating-point mathematics, but the Motorola DSP chips used in Powercore and Pro Tools HD are fixed-point units. Another major difference is that computer operating systems can allocate RAM and CPU cycles dynamically, whereas DSP-based plug-ins have to declare the amount of processing power and memory they need at load time, and ensure that they never exceed these limits. It is this that, as you suggest, which increases the price of platform-specific plug-ins.  0


September 2014
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the
SOS Web Shop)
SOS current Print Magazine: click here for FULL Contents list
Click image for September 2014
WIN Great Prizes in SOS Competitions!

 

Home | Search | News | Current Issue | Tablet Mag | Articles | Forum | Subscribe | Shop | Readers Ads

Advertise | Information | Privacy Policy | Support | Login Help

 

Email: Contact SOS

Telephone: +44 (0)1954 789888

Fax: +44 (0)1954 789895

Registered Office: Media House, Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridge, CB23 8SQ, United Kingdom.

Sound On Sound Ltd is registered in England and Wales.

Company number: 3015516 VAT number: GB 638 5307 26

         

All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2014. All rights reserved.
The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers.

Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media