December 2009
Other recent issues: | NEW MODULE ARMYClavia Nord Modular v3.03 And MicroModular Analogue Modelling SynthsPublished in SOS July 2000 Reviews : Modular Synth
Clavia and I go back a long way. Indeed, the company's first keyboard appeared in March 1995, and I was delighted to conduct the first UK review of it in Sound On Sound. Those of you with complete collections of SOS will recall that I liked it a lot. And why not? It was the first of the DSP-driven 'physically modelled analogue' synths, and at a time when sounding like you were playing a Moog or an ARP meant that you were playing a Moog or an ARP, it was a revelation. Today, the Nord Lead's single 12MIPS 56002 looks almost as creaky as the discrete transistors it emulates, but no matter it is still a fine machine, as are its descendants, the Nords 2 and 3. If the Lead had limitations, they were obvious ones. Firstly, there was the 4-note polyphony. Then there was the lack of a screen or any editing software to illustrate the 'shift menu' controls. Another was the meagre provision of 40 programmable patch memories, and yet another concerned the filter (which refused to self-oscillate, no matter what the provocation). Then there was the lack of a sequencer, the lack of external patch storage (cards came later), the lack of effects... and, of course, the single 'physical' model of the instrument. Fortunately, Clavia are not a company to sit still and in late 1997 they released the Nord Modular, a hybrid of synthesizer and PC that eliminated most of the Nord's deficiencies. It did this by the simple expedient of placing the editor and all the large-scale storage facilities on your computer, and freeing the, now considerably enhanced, DSP power for pure sound-generating duties. Paul Nagle was the lucky so-and-so to review the early version of this (see SOS April and May 1998) and he was as impressed with the early v1.1 Modular as I had been with its predecessor three years before. Since then, Clavia have been zealous in updating the Modular's operating system and editing software, and they have also released a rack version and a cut-down (in size, polyphony and cost) version called the MicroModular see the 'Three Flavours Of Nord Modular' box. Now, in 2000, we have v3 (actually, v3.03) of the Nord Modular. What's more, this isn't simply an update of the PC-based system: it's the first to run on a Macintosh, so this is a perfect opportunity to re-review the Modular, and see how well it has survived the transition between platforms.
Clavia have completely rewritten their editing software so that it will run on both PC (Windows 95/98, and NT4) and Macs supporting Mac OS 8.6 and later. However, the company are among the first to admit that some combinations of Modular hardware, editing software, Macintosh, Mac OS, MIDI interface, and MIDI drivers are problematic. Therefore, it was with some trepidation that I loaded the Editor onto my G3/266 Powerbook running OS 9.0.4. (I had intended to use my aged Quadra 800 as the Editor platform, but a quick glance at the Nord manual put the kibosh on this. Version 3.03 only works on PowerPC machines.) Once the software was in a trivial operation I plugged in my Passport MIDI interface, pressed Apple-M to configure the Editor's MIDI preferences, and... nothing. The Mac couldn't see the Modular hardware. No matter, it must be something simple... Two hours later I had checked, re-checked and triple-checked my software, the software in the Modular itself, the continuity of my MIDI cables, and my MIDI drivers, all to no avail. As a final resort, I decided to download the latest version of OMS. A 'mere' 30 minutes and 2.6Mb later I had installed OMS v2.3.8 on my drive, and voilà! Instant success. The Powerbook could see the Modular, the Editor was active, and everything worked faultlessly. Up To v2.1 At this point, I must ask you to read Paul's reviews from 1998, because a full assessment of the Modular would span a dozen pages, and you can find much of this in the early reviews. Since that time, the Modular has seen two significant updates. Following the launch of the original system, 1999's v2.1 was a major upgrade. Whereas the original system boasted somewhat over 80 modules, this offered 107. Major new modules included an FM oscillator ideal for emulating DX-type sounds, and the Vocal Filter, which Clavia designed to imitate the vowel sounds of the human voice. Next on the list was a 14-band graphic EQ which exceeded the capabilities of similar analogue equalisers, and with much better band separation. In addition, there was the Digitiser (which 'dirties up' the signal by reducing the sample rate and resolution of the output), a Quantiser, and a Ring Modulator. You have a number of options. Firstly, you could dedicate your Mac to editing duties, and have another computer take care of sequencing duties. Alternatively, you might be in a position to drive your sequences from a workstation. But most likely, you'll want to use your Mac for editing, sequencing, and any digital audio requirements. At this point, you'll need a multiple-I/O MIDI interface. Be warned, however, that many users have reported difficulties with numerous combinations of computer/interface/Modular. (See my comments in the main text about downloading OMS v2.3.8.) Potential bear-traps include Mac OS 9.0, earlier versions of OMS, USB, and some MidiSport, MOTU, Opcode, and Digidesign MIDI interfaces. If you're in any doubt about the reliability of your combination, it's best to try before you buy. For the future, I can't see why Clavia don't shift the Editor interface over to USB or even FireWire. Either of these would handle the data requirements much more easily, and leave your MIDI connectors free for the job for which they were designed. What do you say, Clavia? ...And Now v3.03 Moving on, it's v3 that really interests us. This is because, although it offers no new modules, v3 is the one that enables you to edit the Modular and, for that matter, the MicroModular using your Macintosh. So let's look at recent improvements in a bit more detail... One of the most radical changes concerns the number of Modulars or MicroModulars that you can control from a single Editor. Whereas before it was just one lonely synth, the Editor can now support up to four hardware units simultaneously. Of course, this means that you need four pairs of MIDI Ins and Outs just to perform patch editing (see the 'Hooking It Up' box) but I like Clavia's confidence. Another big step forward concerns patch storage within the Modular. This now benefits from a better data compression algorithm so the hardware can store more patches than before up to 891, depending upon complexity. It's very different from the 100 memories of v1. Unfortunately, this enhancement does not apply to the MicroModular because it has 99 defined memories, no matter how simple or complex the patches within them. Sticking with patch sizes for a moment, previous versions limited any given patch to 44 modules. In general, you would run out of DSP power long before this many modules appeared on the screen, but Clavia have removed the limitation nonetheless. I hope that this promises a more powerful Modular in the future one on which 45 or more modules can coexist and operate happily within the power constraint. As for the patches themselves, the big news in v3 concerns the Poly Voice and Common Voice areas. These allow you to divide your patches into two parts. The first contains the modules that are unique to each voice in the patch, while the second contains any that you wish to be common to the whole sound, such as choruses, compressors and so on. This can save significant DSP power, allowing you to build more complex architectures without sacrificing performance.
Finally, there are a number of minor but handy enhancements such as Mute and Bypass buttons in some modules. Unfortunately (and, I suppose, inevitably) some useful functions have bitten the dust between v2.1 and v3.03. Some of these may return later, while others may be gone for good. Examples include the Help Files (I understand that they will be posted on Clavia's home page as soon as they are ready) the Print function, the Delete All Visible Cables function, and the MIDI Tester. Clavia have posted a full list of these omissions on their web site. Now, let's dispel a myth. Some people believe that you can create architectures of greater complexity on the Modular. This is not the case, and there is no sonic difference (in terms of the flexibility of configuration or quality of any given patch) between the MicroModular and the full Modular. Each of the four 'slots' in the Modular has the same strengths and limitations as the single slot of the MicroModular. So, are there any non-audio differences between the Modulars and their smaller sibling? Well, yes. More than just four MicroModulars in a box, the Modulars offer multitimbrality, more memories, more knobs, an enhanced display, and a certain amount of editing from the front panel. If you can afford the Rack, then I recommend that you raise the small amount of extra cash for the Keyboard. The Rack is only for players with space problems, or those who have a specific reason for wanting the synth housed in a rack. As for the MicroModular... it's so tiny, so cute, and so affordable that I'm sure you'll want one of those too! In Use The first thing you must remember when programming and using the Modular is that the Macintosh-based Editor remains merely an editor, (Well, there's nothing 'mere' about it, but you know what I mean.) This means that you can disconnect the Modular from the computer and use it as a fully functional, self-contained synthesizer. OK, it only has a two-octave keyboard and 18 controls, and it loses all the architectural controls within the Editor, but there's nothing stopping you from using it as a powerful prepatched synth. Indeed, add a 'knobby' MIDI controller to the on-board controls, and you're in twiddly business.
So how does it all work? In a word... it's superb. Indeed, the Mac/Modular combination is so flexible and so slick that I find it difficult to review it in a conventional sense. After all, which synth should I review? The punchy triple-oscillator monosynth? The over-endowed dual-oscillator polysynth? The FM synth? The additive synth? They're all in the Nord Modular, as are innumerable others. You can even use its short delay lines to create 'virtual' resonant bodies, thus paving the way for physical modelling (see 'Using The Delays' box). The Modular is also a powerful effects unit,so you can use it to enhance, mangle, EQ, or otherwise affect any signals you care to direct into its dual external signal inputs. Furthermore, you can use the inputs and outputs as an effects loop which you can place anywhere in a patch. This is very powerful stuff. However, be aware that, due to changes in the design of individual modules, some v2.xx patches may exceed the 100 percent DSP load limit in v3.xx. You will then need to edit or simplify them before a sound will emerge. Usually, you can do this without changing the fundamental nature of the patch (for example, by replacing oscillators with slaves) but sometimes it isn't possible. So, How Does It Sound? That the Modular is supremely powerful is without question. However, some people have complained that its filters 'lack bite' or some other such anorak nonsense. If this has any validity, it's because an inordinate nay, ridiculous amount of time is wasted by those same anoraks poring over every detail of the filters, almost as if nothing else matters. Of course, these are a very powerful and important part of an instrument's character, but you should remember that FM and additive synths, as well as some S+S workstations, have none.
Good as patches like this Moog bass are, I found the more esoteric filters far more interesting. In particular, the Vocal Filter and Vocoder are the sources of some gorgeous sounds, spoilt only by occasional digital artefacts that creep in when you modulate them using LFOs and the like. Patch 2, which uses both of these, is one of my own, and is a beautifully simple example of this (see screenshot above). Patch 3, shown on page 187, is another of my favourites an excellent recreation of the classic FM piano. As you can see, it's considerably more complex than the other examples, but it still consumes less than 49 percent of the available DSP power in just one slot.
Up to now, I have written almost universally in praise of the Modular. It's strange, therefore, that I can create a substantial list of its shortcomings, bugs, and omissions. Starting with the bugs, let's review two biggies. The first is obvious as soon as you start creating new architectures within the Editor. Create a patch and set it to drone. Then add a new module. On numerous occasions, you'll hear the sound change sometimes quite dramatically even before you connect anything to the new module! Scary. The second concerns Slot 'D'. Dump a patch into Slots A, B or C and it always sounds the same. Stick the same patch into Slot D and, on occasion, it will refuse to play every second note. This is not good. There are minor bugs too. For example, if you modulate an oscillator using the conventional modulation inputs, its slaves are modulated too. But if you use the FM input on the oscillator, the slaves are unaffected. Weird!
Have I stopped complaining? Sorry, no. There's no way to enable or disable slots using a sequencer command. The best you can do is to send an empty patch to the Slot you wish to silence an operation that causes a glitch in the output of all four Slots. (This is because the Modular optimises its use of the DSPs every time the architecture of any slot is changed.) Clavia have confirmed that they hope to address this in a future revision, but until then... well, it's another pain in the you-know-where. While I'm on my soapbox, I think that Clavia should consider two other enhancements. One is relatively simple: to be able to type parameter values from the keyboard; the other would be for user-definable configurations building blocks of, say, half a dozen modules that you could use to create larger architectures more quickly. Perhaps the most innovative use for the Delays is to construct primitive physical models. You do this by invoking a number of Delays simultaneously and using mixers to feed their outputs back upon themselves. Carefully set up, these then act as resonators and produce audio-frequency outputs. If you then control the delay times using the keyboard you can 'play' the resulting pitches as you would a self-oscillating filter. Next, you can add further looped Delays to act as static resonators (like the wood of a violin, or the bore of a wind instrument). If you then combine both sets of Delays... well, it's probably a horrible noise, but with practice, you can generate some very interesting sounds. I love the irony of this: you are configuring a powerful DSP model of an analogue synthesizer to imitate in analogue fashion the powerful digital methods used to imitate 'real' analogue instruments. Delicious! Conclusions The Nord Modular may be inspired by traditional modular synthesis, but it reaches way, way beyond the confines of '60s and '70s modular synthesis. For every Moog-like sound lurking within it, there are a thousand new sounds beyond the dreams of a traditional synth. However, complex as it can be, the Modular is a doddle to understand and program. Almost before you open the manual (which is far better than most) you can simply mess around until you stumble across something interesting. Of course, you can cheat, sticking with the 600 factory patches, or by downloading any of the thousands available on the Internet. But what a waste that would be! I think that the best way to summarise the Mac/Modular combination is like this: it's the synth most likely to make you a social outcast. I doubt that there's an owner anywhere that hasn't slipped out of bed, donned headphones, and indulged in a few wee hours of gratuitous experimentation. Mind you, if your prime purpose for owning a polysynth is conventional songwriting or accompaniment, the Modular is probably not the instrument for you. If, on the other hand, sound design excites you (as it does me) you'll soon be addicted. Sure, instant gratification is not always on the menu, but long-term satisfaction is almost guaranteed. Just don't blame me when your friends complain that they haven't seen you for months. MicroModular Differences:
Published in SOS July 2000 | Saturday 21st November 2009 Modular Synth ![]() Modular Analogue Synthesizer Synthetic Music Systems have a unique approach to designing modular synths that are both high in quality and, wait for it, low in price. Let's investigate... RS420 Octave Controller • RS100 MkII Low-pass Filter • RS370 Poly Harmonic Generator Analogue Systems' modules continue to develop and evolve. We take a look at a selection of the latest designs. DLFO Dual LFO • RM2S Stereo Ring Modulator • VCEQ3 We conclude our three-part exploration of Wowa Cwjeman's new range of exclusive analogue synth modules. VCO-2RM • MMF-1 • ADSR-VC2 • VCA-2P Part 2: We continue our exploration of Wowa Cwjeman's new range of exclusive analogue synth modules. Analogue Voice Module Swedish designer Wowa Cwejman has built a reputation for exclusive analogue synths. Now he's going modular, starting with the VM1 Voice module... Patchable Analogue & Digital Synthesizer ![]() Patchable Analogue & Digital Synthesizer ![]() Polyphonic Harmonic Generator & Expander Having built their reputation on knob-heavy modular synths, British manufacturer Analogue Systems surprise everyone by bringing out a menu-driven additive synthesis module! But don't worry — the optional expander is covered with things to tweak and turn... Semi-modular Analogue Synth Swedish company Cwejman have recognised that there is no way to build a cheap semi-modular analogue synth for mass-market sale these days (if there ever was). Enter the premium, but meticulously crafted S1 MkII... Synthesis Modules Since the launch of their A100 modular synth in the mid-'90s, Doepfer have been quietly adding modules to the system, some fairly simple, others splendidly esoteric. We explore some of the latest... Patchable Analogue Modular Synth System Belgian company Lassence are seeking to gain recognition as a small modular synth manufacturer with their new patchable µVentury II system. But there's plenty of competition in the homegrown analogue market these days. Does the µVentury II have what it takes? Four-voice Analogue Rack Synth Formerly the East German state synth company (a great concept in itself), Vermona re-emerged last year with the MARS monophonic analogue synth. Clearly determined to win back their reputation, they've already returned with the four-voice Perfourmer... Modular Analogue Synth & Integrator Synth Modules The Apprentice - a keyboard-less wooden casing designed to house synth modules - is the latest addition to Analogue Systems' fully modular Integrator series of analogue synths. We test one fitted with some of the company's new modules... December 2009
Click image for Contents
Other recent issues: SOS News Headlines
WIN Great Prizes in SOS Competitions!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||