Sony MDS JE520
Minidisc Recorder
Reviews : Stereo Recorder
Yes, it's a Minidisc machine and it's not even a multitrack, just
a stereo recorder. Why on earth could you possibly want one in
the studio? DAVE SHAPTON explains...
How's this for a deal: a 20-bit digital-to-analogue converter,
with co-axial and optical inputs, for less than £250. Oh, and
by the way, it includes a sample-rate converter so that all that
stuff you mastered at 48kHz can be reduced to 44.1kHz. Even better,
it comes from Sony, a company that knows a bit about digital audio.
And what if I told you that the price includes a high-spec Minidisc
recorder/player? You'd probably do what I did. I bought one, and
am still wondering how you can possibly get so much hi-tech magic
for so little.
SONY MDS JE520
pros
 |
Remarkably cheap random access digital recorder. |
 |
Digital I/O. |
 |
Built-in sample rate converter. |
cons
 |
Daft and pointless SCMS. |
summary
| At this price, you can't afford not to buy one. |

|
I'm a recent convert to Minidisc. I've worked with digital audio
for a very long time and I've always tried to avoid any sort of
audio compression, figuring that the closest you could get to
the original sound was to leave it alone after it has been digitised.
Now I've got a different viewpoint for several reasons -- not
the least of which is that Minidisc is now so good that I really
can't tell the difference between the original and a compressed
Minidisc recording. Another reason is that Minidisc is now getting
stupidly cheap. So cheap, in fact, that I wouldn't be surprised
if Sony and the other manufacturers of Minidisc equipment are
making very little money indeed on the sale of their products,
for the sake of building market share for the format.
I got hooked on Minidisc when I saw a little Sony recording Minidisc
Walkman in an airport Duty Free shop. I don't normally go in for
this sort of impulse buy, but I was looking for a better way to
record interviews and this seemed ideal. Incredibly, you can get
nearly two and a half hours on to a Minidisc if you use Mono mode.
This use alone would justify the expense of £160, not to mention
the fact that with a decent stereo microphone I could make location
recordings to a very high standard. The Walkman (an MZ R35) was
even better than I had hoped, with great converters and the ability
to record digitally from anything with an optical digital output.
The only real drawback I could find was that the line out was
a miniature stereo jack. This, however, is hardly a justified
criticism of something you are supposed to listen to while you
are jogging. And speaking of jogging, there is a 20-second buffer
which means that you can shake the thing like mad for what seems
like an eternity, and it won't even glitch.
But there is something intrinsically naff about using any kind
of Walkman device as a music source with a full size hi-fi, or
in a studio. I can't help feeling that such a tiny thing is not
going to stand up to heavy, or even moderate use, for very long.
Mine has worked perfectly so far, but with the price of full-size
players being so low, I felt compelled to buy one of these as
well.
The Sony MDS JE520 is the same size as almost every other bit
of hi-fi gear that doesn't describe itself as Midi or Mini. It
is black as well, so it will match practically every other piece
of high-tech equipment you have, and certainly wouldn't look out
of place in a project studio. It has a large fluorescent display,
at least half of which is devoted to displaying disk and track
names. The big remote control has a full alphanumeric (but not
QWERTY) keyboard to speed up the process of titling (until you've
tried it, you might not realize how useful it is to be able to
see information like "Recorded June 1997 at Big Dave's. Good guitar
solo. Listen for the string breaking at the start of the third
verse").
Using a Minidisc device is just like using a CD player, until
you realize that you can record as well. The MDS JE520 caters
for this in several ways. Firstly, there are conventional analogue
inputs. You can also record digitally via the co-axial or optical
inputs, and the sample rate converter automatically changes the
sample rate to 44.1kHz from either 48 or 32kHz. When recording
digitally, it is not normally necessary to set any levels, because
the digital data stream contains its own absolute level information
in the digits themselves. Surprisingly, though, the MDS JE520
allows you to vary levels digitally, which may at times be useful
if an original recording was a bit low throughout. But it's not
a panacea for bad levels, because any gain applied during the
transfer to Minidisc will also bring up the noise floor, with
the result that the recording will sound the same as the original,
but louder.
|
As you can tell from its eponymous title, Minidisc is very small.
So it can't store as much data as a (merely) 'Compact' Disc. The
only way to get the same amount of music on an MD as on a CD is
to shrink the data until it does fit. It's actually very easy
to make digital audio fit into a smaller space: you can halve
the sample rate, reduce the number of bits to eight instead of
16, and you can make it mono instead of stereo. And it would sound
terrible.
Alternatively you can use some terrifyingly sophisticated algorithms
to analyse the full-resolution audio, extract the parts of it
that are important to our brains when we are 'perceiving' the
audio, and, quite simply, not bother to record anything else.
This is what the ATRAC Minidisc compression algorithm (Adaptive
TRansform Acoustic Coding) does. Rather than simply reducing the
resolution of the recorded material, and hence the quality, ATRAC
looks for parts of the frequency spectrum that are hidden, or
masked by other frequencies that may be louder or in a frequency
band that is more sensitive to the ear (or, arguably, the brain).
Essentially, it works on the principle that what you don't hear
in the original you won't miss if it's not reproduced. Bear this
in mind when considering the following: what happens if you make
a copy of material that is already compressed? The numbers would
suggest that if you throw away four fifths of the data and then
re-compress, you will end up with audio at one twenty-fifth of
its original quality. But if you actually try this you will be
amazed at how little is actually lost (as long as you use the
same kind of compression -- if you move between different compression
types then you are in big trouble). What's going on here?
Remember that ATRAC works by leaving out information that would
not have been audible because of masking effects by other frequencies.
ATRAC knows that it can only store a fifth of full-bandwidth audio
information. But that's not as much of a problem as it might seem,
because the other four-fifths of the information was discarded
the first time the audio was compressed. So it isn't there to
be compressed a second time. Therefore all the available bandwidth
can be used to store the remaining frequencies, which hardly need
to be compressed at all. Nevertheless, ATRAC, in common with most
compression schemes, has to work harder with complex mixes than
with individual voices or monophonic instruments. But I have to
say that I have heard very few examples of music that really catch
out the latest ATRAC algorithms. |
|
There is also a digital fade facility that hints at the possibility
of producing fully edited master recordings with no additional
equipment (especially since the Minidisc format allows track re-ordering
and even within-track edits).
| The latest Sony Minidisc recorders use ATRAC 4.5 compression.
A new compression chip (the CXD 2537R, if you want to impress
people at cocktail parties) "offers superior fidelity by use of
adaptive high-frequency control technology" according to a Sony
press release. What this means is that the algorithm looks at
the frequencies present and varies the encoding resolution, depending
how important an individual range of frequencies seems to be in
the overall context of the music. The result is an even better
use of the available data bandwidth. This, together with a "24-bit
coefficient for word length calculation" has improved the total
dynamic distortion caused by ATRAC by around 8dB relative to previous
incarnations of the chip. (For a detailed discussion of audio
data reduction and compression, see Hugh Robjohns' piece in the
August edition of SOS.) |
|
Is is as good as DAT? Well, I couldn't reliably tell the difference
between my Minidisc recorder and the CD original. At that point,
I think you have to say that, subjectively, it is as good as DAT.
Remember, though, that Minidisc is a compressed format and that
as much as 80 percent of the original data is thrown away during
the compression process (but see the box on this above). As such,
you won't be able to make perfect copies of a Minidisc recording
on to another Minidisc, even via a digital connector -- because
inevitably some quality will be lost as the ATRAC compressed digital
audio is uncompressed for transfer via the optical digital interface,
and recompressed as it is recorded onto the destination Minidisc.
You could actually make loss-free copies if there were a way of
duplicating the data, as opposed to the audio that the data (imperfectly)
represents. If this were possible, making perfect digital copies
would be as simple as a file-copy operation on a desktop computer,
because, essentially, that's what it would be. Sony already has
the ideal way to do this: Firewire (also attractively known as
IEEE 1394 and Sony's preferred appellation, 'iLink'). Firewire,
as I shall continue to call it, is a scorchingly fast data connection
that is quick enough for several channels of digital video, never
mind digital audio. It's cheap and robust, and could no doubt
be used to copy MDs several times faster than real time. Inevitably,
though, I suppose the copyright lobby would object, which is why
MDs are lumbered with the anti-musician, anti-common sense and
generally completely daft Serial Copy Management System (SCMS),
which prevents a digital copy being made from a recording that
was itself recorded via a digital interface.
CONCLUSION
The MDS JE520 has no right to sound as good as it does, and still
only cost around £230. But it does sound brilliant and, incredibly,
certain hi-fi chains such as Richer Sounds are selling it for
even less than £200, together with blank Minidiscs that cost less
than £2. I may be wrong, but I don't think there's ever been a
bargain quite like this one. Remember, this is not old stock being
dumped -- it's the latest model from a range that is growing all
the time.

| |
 |
Prices vary,
but most Sony Centres sell the JE520 for £229.95 including VAT.
|
|
| |
 |
Sony UK (Consumer Division),
The Heights, Brooklands, Weybridge,
Surrey KT13 0XW, UK. |
|
| |
 |
+44 (0)990 111999. |
|
| |
 |
www.sony.co.uk |
|
|